Disclaimer: This translation does not guarantee complete accuracy, please confirm with the original page text.
## Pinḍaniyukti: An Observation
**(Gā. 682, 6831)** This points towards the explanation of the *Logassa* text in the *Caturviṁśatistava*.
2. The mention of *“Āyare angammi ya puvvuṭṭiō”* is found in the *Ācārāṅganiyukti* (Gā. 5). The *Daśavaikālika*’s *Kṣullakācāra* study appointment (Gā. 154-61) and the *Ācāra* and *Uttarādhyayana*’s *Caturangīya* study appointment (Gā. 144-58) provide a detailed description of the word *anga*. This makes it clear that the *Daśavaikālika* and *Uttarādhyayana* appointments were composed before the *Ācārāṅga*.
3. The mention of *“Viṇao puvubuddivo”* (Gā. 29) in the *Uttarādhyayana* appointment points towards the *Daśavaikālika*’s *Vinayasamādhi* appointment (Gā. 286-303). This quote makes it clear that the *Uttarādhyayana* appointment was composed after the *Daśavaikālika*.
4. The quote *“Kāma puvvuṭṭhiā”* (Gā. 200) in the *Uttarādhyayana* appointment points towards the explanation of the word *“Kāma”* described in the *Daśavaikālikaniyukti* (Gā. 137-41). This makes it clear that the *Daśavaikālikaniyukti* was composed before the *Uttarādhyayana*.
5. The mention of *“Āyār-sutan bhaṇiyam”* in the *Sūtrakṛtāṅganiyukti* (Gā. 183) makes it clear that the *Daśavaikālika* and *Uttarādhyayana* appointments were composed before it, because the description of *Ācāra* is found in *Daśani* (Gā. 154-61) and the description of *Śruta* is found in *Uni* (Gā. 29).
6. Some verses explaining *Karaṇa* described in the *Uttarādhyayana* appointment are found in the *Sūtrakṛtāṅganiyukti*.
7. The mention of *“Gantho puvvuḍdiddyo”* (Gā. 127) in the *Sūtrakṛtāṅganiyukti* points towards the explanation of the word *“Grantha”* described in the *Uttarādhyayana* appointment (Gā. 234-37). This quote makes it clear that the *Uttarādhyayana* appointment was composed before the *Sūtrakṛtāṅganiyukti*.
8. The mention of *“Jah vakkaṁ tah bhāsā”* described in the *Ācārāṅganiyukti* (Gā. 336) points towards the *Daśavaikālika*’s *Vakkasuddhi* study appointment (Gā. 245-58).
9. The mention of *“Dhammo puvubuddiṭṭo”* in the *Sūtrakṛtāṅganiyukti* (Gā. 99) points towards the explanation of the word *“Dharma”* described in the *Daśavaikālikaniyukti* (Gā. 36-40). This makes it clear that the *Sūtrakṛtāṅganiyukti* was composed later.
10. The mention of *“Jo cev hoti mokkho, sā u vimutti pagayam”* in the *Ācārāṅganiyukti* (Gā. 365) points towards the explanation of *Mokṣa* described in the *Uttarādhyayana* appointment (Gā. 491-94).
The above mentions make it clear that the order of composition of the appointments is the same as the order in which they pledged to write the appointments.
1. This number is from the *Āvaśyakaniyukti* volume 2, published by Jain Vishva Bharati.| SR No. | 001945 |
| Book Title | Agam 41 Mool 02 Pind Niryukti Sutra |
| Original Sutra Author | N/A |
| Author | Dulahrajmuni |
| Publisher | Jain Vishva Bharati |
| Publication Year | 2008 |
| Total Pages | 492 |
| Language | Prakrit, Sanskrit, Hindi |
| Classification | Book_Devnagari, Agam, Canon, Ethics, & agam_pindniryukti |
| File Size | 9 MB |