________________ 232 STUDIES IN JAIN LITERATURE p. 351 41. p. 266 (1 10) to p. 267 (1 13) p. 349, p. 348 42. p. 267 (11 22-26) p. 387 43. p. 268 (11 15-19) p. 350 44. p. 270 (1 25) to p. 271 (1 21) 45. p. 276 (11 22-28) p. 382 46. p. 277 (11 28-29) 379 47. p. 288 (1 9) to p. 289 (1 16) p. 357, 356 48. p. 292 (11 20-25) p. 383-84 49. p. 294 (11 13-14) p. 384 50. p. 298 (11 25-27) p. 384 p. 302 (11 11-27) pp. 379-381 p. 303 (11 13-15) 53. p. 304 (1 25) to p. 305 (1 25) pp. 377-78 p. 310 (11 19-25) p. 404 p. 319 (11 19-22) p. 397 56. p. 335 (11 25-29) pp. 404-405 57. p. 350 (11 6-16) pp. 238-239 58. p. 350 (11 17-24) Pp. 234-235 Let us consider a few remarkable parallelisms from those listed : p. 380 When we compare the two passages indicated by the number 11 we find that the passage in Somesvara is defective as the lines "3ta ja anta: 7 Dartai एकस्यैव शब्दस्यावृत्तिमन्तरेणानेकार्थप्रतिपादनसामर्थ्यासंभवात् / न चासावनिबन्धना शक्या कल्पयितुम् / " are left out by Somesvara or the scribe from the original passage found in the Vyaktiviveka4 from where Hemacandra borrows it. Hemacandra's long passage is made up of passages borrowed from Vyaktiviveka and Vakroktijivita. Somesvara's short passage appears to have been adopted from Hemacandra. The two passages numbered 37 contain one very significant detail. Hemacandra illustrates द्रव्येण उपमानोपमेययोर्भेदः by तीर्थकर इव गणधरः पूज्यः / Somesvara's illustration reads : शिव इव केशवः पूज्यः / These two examples are in conformity with the respective creed of the two authors. Barring these examples, the two passages are nearly, identical. This fact indicates that the passage with a suitable change has been lifted by one from the other. www.jainelibrary.org For Private & Personal Use Only Jain Education International
