________________
CHAPTER XI
361
bringing together the first and the fourth predicates in a complex expressed judgment.
The sixth mode, viz., “In a certain sense, the jar is not, and is inexpressible", asserts the truth of non-being of the jar conjointly with the inexpressible truth of the compresence of the 'being' and the 'non-being' of the same object.' This, again, is a combined mode resulting from bringing together the second and the fourth predicates in a complex expressed judgment.
The seventh and last mode, viz., "In a certain sense, the jar is, is not, and is inexpressible”, combines the consecutive presentation of the "being' and the 'non-being', conjointly with the co-presentation or compresence, of the 'being' and the "non-being' of the jar.' This mode is evidently a resultant of bringing together, within its fold, the third and the fourth predicates of the conditional dialectic.
Unlike the first two and the fourth predications, each of which contains a simple predicate involving one of the three primary concepts, the fifth, the sixth and the seventh predications are, severally, complex in structure, the last one being the most complex among them. This is so because they are assertions of complex judgments.
These are the seven modes each of which contains one
1. Cf. tathā, ekadese paraparyā yaiḥ asadbhārenārpito višeşito'nyasmirs
tu dese svaparaparyāyaih sadbhāvāsadbhāvābhyāṁ sattvā sattuābhyam yugapad asänketikenaikena śabdena raktum viraksitah
kumbho'sannavaktavyaś ca bhavati / Ibid. 2. Ibid.
Jain Education International
For Private & Personal Use Only
www.jainelibrary.org
