Disclaimer: This translation does not guarantee complete accuracy, please confirm with the original page text.
In it, one is considered to be Digambara Acharya and the other "Hrashti Shvetambara Acharya. Gandhahashti is an epithet. It is believed that the renowned scholar Samantabhadra from the Digambara tradition is identified with this epithet, and thus it emerges that Swami Samantabhadra, who held the Gandhahashti title, composed a commentary on the Tattvarthasutra of reader Umaswati. In the Shvetambara tradition, it is currently believed that Gandhahashti refers to the disciple of the elderly scholar Siddhasena Divakara. According to this belief, it follows that the author of Sanmati and Siddhasena Divakara, the elderly disciple, wrote a commentary on the Tattvarthasutras of reader Umaswati. This dual belief and the resulting assertion are not acceptable as they lack evidential support. The epithet Gandhahashti is found in connection with the work of Digambara Acharya Samantabhadra. This is clearly visible in the commentary of Laghu Samantabhadra's Dasasahastri. Laghu Samantabhadra is believed to have lived around the 14th-15th century. No definitive evidence supporting this reference is still available. In the existing texts, “Purisaṃvara Jallīka” has been attributed the epithet Gandhahashti. Moreover, inscriptions from the 10th and 11th centuries mention a name associated with Gandhahashti, and one Jain temple is also named ‘Savati Gadhavaran Jinalaya.” See Hiralaal's compiled “Jain Shilalekh Sangrah,” pages 123 and 129, regarding “Shilalekh on Chandragiri Mountain.” 1. See Pandit Jugal Kishorji written “Swami Samantabhadra,” pages 214-220.