________________
P. 354. A. 6. S. 6.
196
According to हेमचन्द्र, however, प्रतिवस्तूपमा can be included in facrtat. Not even that, but Teziza as mentioned and defined by मम्मट is included under निदर्शना by हेमचन्द्र. All the three subdivisions of farasiat as treated seperately by मम्मट are brought under one main निदर्शना by हेमचन्द्र. It is difficult to understand then why Atk should treat safapara as a seperate ( 34637117 ) figure of speech. This question must have arisen in the mind of 24974 also, for in the commentary he makes a clear distinction between sufragare and faciar, by first introducing the question thus:ननुचार्थान्तरन्यासोऽपि निदर्शनलक्षणेन संग्रहीष्यते, तरिक तस्यपृथग्लक्षणकरणेनेत्या 978911 etc. etc. à faaz 399qà i
यत्र सामान्यस्य विशेषस्य वा विशेषेण समर्थनं तनिदर्शनम् । यत्रतु विशेषस्य सामान्येन समर्थनं सोऽर्थान्तरन्यासः ॥
Verse 584 : This would be, according to AFAZ, a variety of facial which he defines as follows:-- " स्वस्वहेत्वन्वयस्योक्तिः क्रिययैव च सापरा."
Bajatiles: a rich man. Fagret: from its stem. All the verses cited above are illustrations of agreement. But the following two verses contain illustrations of a negative character.
It should be noted here that the verse 549 is given by RFÆT as an instance of equazzal, while the verse 550 is according to AFHC an illustration of Ezra.
Verse 549 : A capable man is appointed ( liter. is yoked ) at the head of affairs, simply because of the bad nature of his merits ( said ironically ). A fat lazy bull sleeps at ease without his neck being scarred (by the rubbing of yoke ).
Verse 550 : Even when you merely desire to wield the sword in your hand, the fighters on the side of your enemies no longer show their mischievous propensities
Jain Education International
For Private & Personal Use Only
www.jainelibrary.org
