________________
P. 220. A. 3. S. 5.)
138
trend is this that the subject in one sentence becomes the object in the following sentence, but in the last sentence, दयितसंगमभूषः is used instead of तमपि वल्लभसङ्गः and hence the fault. Similarly in 269 fazla FFT: 34f7 is the trend; but in the 4th line (cà a Farfaita) ca has a different order in that the sentence has no object and hence the fault.
Again in the verse 270 which means:—“When this sage is advancing angrily towards me-sage with the power of valour and penance, I feel a desire to encounter him as well as to fall at his feet,” 91919dETIU must be placed at the beginning of the third line, for that act is prompted by the greatness of the sage's penance which is mentioned first. In the verse 271, the trend is to condemn the 39719S by showing the excellence of उपमेयs, but in the last sentence भवतु च द्विचन्द्रं नभः, द्विचन्द्रं becomes an adjective of नभः. In reality it ought to be (791: FearsHal ) a predicate. Similarly in 272 तद्वत्रं यदि मुद्रिता शशिकथा the whole trend is to show the excellence of 3970S. But in the last line meaning that the creater creates superflous things, the general proposition conveys the idea of resemblance not excellence, hence the fault.
If however a particular order is not broken, there is no fault of 347. For instance in 273 “When a warrior started for the battlefield, his little boy began asking him where he was going. This question being inauspicious, his mother remonstrated with him for asking it. Enraged at this, the boy stammered forth the word वजसि instead of क्व व्रजसि. But the the father understood purport of the question and became dis-spirited with the dread of superstition.
Jain Education International
For Private & Personal Use Only
www.jainelibrary.org
