Tulsi Prajna 1995 07

SR No.: 524584
Original Sutra Author: N/A
Author: Parmeshwar Solanki
Publisher: Jain Vishva Bharati
Publication Year: 1995
Total Pages: 164
Language: Hindi
Classification: Magazine, India_Tulsi Prajna, & India
File Size: 7 MB

Page 138

Vol. XXI, No. 2
51
They are independent. But this does not mean that they don't see even the language structure. Here I want to state that whatever rule of grammar is to be introduced it is introduced by a single sūtra. There is no need of seeking the help of previous or other sūtras to express the meaning of that particular sūtra. By introducing (graf) system Pāņinian tantra has become very toilsome for a new learner. The main aim of grammar is to teach the learner the rules of the language structure as easily and simply as possible.
Although the usage of technical terms in Kātantra is rare yet whereever they have been used they are quite general in usage, and are short, c.g. fat, su , WTA, FETT, Era, aret, H, fot.
Katantrakāra while defining the term padam says gerecatetereant 94 (15) that both the elements tbat which is to be added i. e, inflectional suffix, and that with which the former is to be added i.e. either stem or root, even joining the same entity can not be padam unless they denote any meaning. Pāṇipi says that anything which is with सुप (सुबन्त) or with तिक, तिउन्त. is pada. Thus it is clear that Papini takes pada as a morphological unit and so has defined it but it is not accepted by Kātantra. In the opinion of Kātantra the pada is of syntactic and semantic importance, because the meaning can not be expressed without syntactic and semantic structure. So he says that until it is not expressing any meaning despite the inflectional suffixes being be added to it, it is not padam. So in the definition of Kātantra, the main emphasis is on meaning while Panini is concerned only with the formation,
Kātantrakāra has also given very simple definitions of case categories. Defining कर्ता he says-One who does or acts is कर्ता (पः करोति
af 380) That which is done, is ** (na feat att ** 381). That by which is done, iso (fuat al *CUTÆ 3. 2) that for whom one wants to give, that for whom sometbing appears good or that for whom something is borne, is #ESTA, Fhifach, Trad, arcaa a aa gara 388. that from which something is seperated, that from which fear enemated, that from which something is got is a , gatafa, HTEET, atara 400) that which or who is the base, is ofert a are carrier 414). In the commentary, this base alatt is explained of three typesऔपश्लेषिक, वैषयिक and अभिण्यापक.
Pāņini is silent about the difinition of compounds. He defines
but not HTA. But Kātantrakāra does not leave undefined even HATE.
Kātantrakāra says- where the # padas become qera, there it is समास. युक्तार्यक means that nāma padas may be able to denote the