Nirgrantha-1

SR No.: 522701
Original Sutra Author: N/A
Author: M A Dhaky, Jitendra B Shah
Publisher: Shardaben Chimanbhai Educational Research Centre
Publication Year: 1995
Total Pages: 342
Language: English, Hindi, Gujarati
Classification: Magazine, India_Nirgrantha, & India
File Size: 10 MB

Page 123

Nirgrantha
of the paintings of this series. It is painted in continuation of the style of the various dated Samgrahanīs listed above. However, trees in the archaic style depicted in silhouette against a monochromatic background is in contradiction to the realism of the faces. This shows the artist's full enjoyment of the newly acquired skill which he concentrates only on the faces. He could not show the same degree of skill when he made Krsna sit in crosslegged posture. This Balagopala Stuti should be dated c. A.D. 1630-40. The dispersed Bhagavata paintings were painted around the same period which were earlier published by Herman Goetz, Stuart Cary Welch and Milo C. Beach, R.K. Tandon, and Stella. Kramarisch 64. It is apparent from the series that there were many hands at work.
100
Lalit Kumar
The Popular Mughal style in the 17th century had also influenced the Gujarati paintings at different levels and in different areas. One of these examples is the Gita Govinda of B. J. Institute, Ahmedabad. It has been put in a class apart. But the paintings follow the general style of the 17th century which is fairly obvious in the case of the male figures. (Plate 10). The stunted females, with their faces having round and sloping forehead and narrow waist, show an interpretation of the new experience at a different level. The dupatta worn by the females provide the background in silhouette to the figure. It is a hallmark of the style of these paintings. Though there is a little folkish element in the style, these paintings can be easily attributed to c A. D. 1630. The Ragamālā dated A. D. 1608 is the only document which has no antecedent from Gujarat. However, one can see there a distant echo of the Caurapañcasika Style. In fact, the Caurapañcāśīkā influence had been working at different levels in some parts of Rajasthan too. The Yasodhara Caritra dated A. D. 1596%, a second set of the same text painted at Amer in A. D. 1590 and the Adipuräna painted at Mozamabad in A. D. 1606, are three very important examples published by Saryu Doshi which further corroborates the fact that the Caurapafcäsikä style was spreading far away from its home in Uttar Pradesh to the region of Malwa, Gujarat, and Rajasthan. Therefore, it is quite obvious that the first expression of Malwa, Mewar, Amer, and later Gujarati painting styles are rooted in the Caurapancasika-Candayana style, a very vital and viable painting tradition. The Cawand Ragamālā dated A. D. 1605, considered to be the earliest document of Mewari painting, should be studied in this milieu. It seems the product of the New Gujarati Jaina painting style in Rajasthan. There is very little which can be definitely attributed to Mughal in this Ragamālā set.
Appendix A
Persian horses and the provenance of certain highly controversial documents of paintings:
These horses based on Persian model have their characteristic style of strapping, the most apparent feature being the loops with a tasselled pendant seen on the thighs of their hind legs. The horses caprisoned in this fashion are found in the Mandu Kalpasūtra dated A. D. 1439 in National Museum, another Kalpasūtra dated c. A. D. 1430 in the L. D. Institute of Indology, Ahmedabad", and the Shah Nämä of c. A. D. 1450 in Reitberg