________________
52
RAMKRISHNA BHATTACHARYA
SAMBODHI
33. Gloss on SK, v. 27, pp. 167-68. 34. Gita Press ed. Trans. Swami Madhavananda, p. 423. 35. Anandasrama ed., p. 554. 36. See also Nilakaņțha's commentary on Mbh., Āraṇyaka. 32. 16-18, 32-37 (vulgate). 37. Cited in Chattopadhyaya (1969), p. 59. 38. On BS, 2. 133 (NSP ed.), p. 481; trans. In Chattopadhyaya, ibid. 39. SDS, ch. 1, (BORI ed.), pp. 12-13; trans. E. B. Cowell (Parimal ed.), p. 11. Sāyaṇa SDS, ch.
1, (BORI -Mādhava also quotes a verse attributed to the svabhāvavādins : The fire is hot, the water is cold, refreshing cool the breeze of morn; By whom came this variety? From their own nature was it born.
(ibid.) . 40. Bhāmation BS, 2.1.33: tasmād upapannar yadȚcchayā vā svabhāvādvā lilayā vā jagat
sarjanaṁ bhagavato maheśvaratyeti (NSP ed., pp. 481-82). 41. Jamnagar ed., vol. 2, pp. 160-61. 42. See Dasgupta, vol. 2, p. 396. 43. See above. For a study of the focal position of svabhāva in the Ayurvedic tradition, see
Chattopadhyaya (1979), pp. 181-84. He refers particularly to CS, Sūtrasthāna, 1. 24 and 30. 44. On SS, śārirasthāna, 1. 11, p. 340. 45. Phaņibhūsaņa Tarkavāgisa flatly refuses to accept Dalhaņa's view on yadscchā (vol. 4, p.
184. 46. ASV, p. 12. 9-11; SKSVr, p. 14.22 47. For sources, etc. see Kulkarni. I have no access to Samantabhadra's Āptamiņāsā (sixth
century), so I have followed Malavania's Introduction to Ganadharavāda (Hindi
translation), p. 128. 48. Quoted in Kulkarni, p. 16 n22. 49. Ibid., pp.16-17. 50. SVS ch. 2, w 186-88, pp. 51-52. Trans. mine. 51. Ibid., v. 191-93, pp.52-53. 52. Ibid., pp. 45, 53, "Tippani". Dixit thinks that the difference between svabhāvavāda and
niyativāda is of a minor nature (ibid. p. 8). See also Basham, p. 226. However, Basham's view that "svabhāvarāda was a small sub-sect of Ājivikism" (p.226) is, in my opinion, quite
