Sambodhi 1990 Vol 17

SR No.: 520767
Original Sutra Author: N/A
Author: H C Bhayani
Publisher: L D Indology Ahmedabad
Publication Year: 1990
Total Pages: 151
Language: English, Sanskrit, Prakrit, Gujarati
Classification: Magazine, India_Sambodhi, & India
File Size: 6 MB

Page 58

53
32. NALOPAH SUPSVARASAMINĀTUGVIDHIŞU KRTI PURVATRA
SIDDHAH// VIII. iv. 2241/
Pānini has the sūtras Pūrvatrāsiddham' (P. VIII. ii. 1) and 'Nalopah supsvarasamjñātugvidhişu kşti' (P. VIII. ii. 2). The latter sūtra expects the former by Anuvytti, since it falls into the Parvatrasiddha Adhikara of the Tripādi. Bhojadeva too has the sutras Púrvatrāsiddham' and 'Nalopah supi' (B. VII. iii. 38-39). But in view of the Pāṇinian sūtra the specific mention of the words "Sup-svara-samjñā-tugvidhisu' and 'Kști' is expected in the Bhojadeva's sūtra, especially since it enjoins the Asiddhatva of Nalopa. The sūtra, therefore, needs to be emended as shown above.
33. VĀKYASYA TEH PLUTA UDĀTTAH// VIII. iv. 225||
Pāṇini has the sõtra Vākyasya Teh pluta udattah (P. VIII. ij. 82). Bhojadeva has adopted this sūtra in two places, viz., Vakyasya teh' (B. VII. iii 131) and Pluta udattah' (B. VIII. iv. 225). Evidently, Bhojadeva seems to refer to his previous sūtra prescribing the Udatta accent. The Kāśika justifies the words Vākyasya çeh' in the Pāṇinian sutra as follows: Vakya-grahanam antyasya padasya pluta--nivettyartham/ Tigrahanam vyanjanäntarasyäpi țer acah pluto yathā syāt-'Agnici3d iti/. Dr. Chintamani reads Bloojadeva's sutra as 'Pluta Udattah' (B. VIII. iv. 225). The Sūtra is deficient and hence needs to be emended as shown above.
34. EKADEŠAH PADADAU VODĀTTAH // VIII. iv. 231//
Panini has the Sūtra 'Svarito vā'nudatte padādau' (P. VIII. ii. 6). wherein the Ekādesa of the Udatta followed by initial Anudātta of a word is prescribed as Svarita optionally. Bhojadeva has preferred to prescribe the Udätta of the Anudatta optionally in the same position. Dr. Chintamani reads Bhojadeva's Sūtra as 'Ekāde apadādau pădake vakye' (B. VIII. iv. 231). Evidently, the last word seems to be connected with the subsequent Sūtra. The reading, therefore, needs to be emenned as shown above.
REFERENCES :
1. Patanjala Mahabhäşya on Päņini's Aştādlıyāyī, with Udyota and
Pradipa commentaries. 2. Kāśika of Vamana-Jayāditya, with Nyasa and Padamañjari commen
taries. 3. Sarasvati-kanthabharaṇa-vyäkarapa of Bhojadeva, Edited by Dr. T. R.
Chintamani, University of Madras, 1932.