________________
Fuaing up of some l'ariants from
Kalidasa
J.& R-. (P.SE PG ) agzie: a. O also supported by
SAFE . Räghava p (P... - Cazz, aij, naaao G. (P = '218) azaz: also pro noted in Ft Note:
#: alagao S.R. - (P. co.219) 27 . ; slagao-no other vanants
10 noted in the Fi. note.
The verse is identically inentioned al 10. fls by all. H's, Chef: is mostly accepted, of course without even dreaming of consulting H while his 9: and safego are accepted by some.
6 219151oH-nagkalo with I' for ias suggested in the Ft. 11010 as
u variant, B. (P.84,3120 ) #9; rà as palo J.&R. (P. PX: P170) *), ia' ag väl also supported by Raghava
P34 U. (P.02. &178) #, ca ac malo G. (P.28: 8128) #7'; #) noted in the Ft, notes far as it SR (PPG P170) #), ia az kalo Re (P xau 3138) 427 pa' et gal, o also noted 2219151 76?:
in Ft Note This verse Is differently numbered as १२०, २१, २२ and २३ by different editors
The above discussion should bring home oui point that while atteripting a critical edition of the works of Kalidāsa, -and we know that the Sahitya Akademi editions are equally imperfect,- we have to take into account the evidences supplied by the works of Anandavardhana, Mammata, Hemacandra, Bhoja and host of other alamkāra works with numerous learned commentaries on them. We know that Mammata's. K. P. is being credited with more than eighty conimentaries and such other authorities have got to be taken into consideration very seriously as they are perhaps the most important research tool available, Hemacandra in particular proving most useful.
