Page Text
________________
Samkhyanakka Madhara
and the Tattvakaumudi we find the kartka tecluded in the origłual text. The Yuktidipika (p 2, v 14) has a verse wbich is clearly sa Imitoon of 73
"al pagrantham anal parihar sarvals tantragunav pular, parmarsasya tantrasya bimbam adarlagath yather
The author of V, seems to be fond of povel interpretations He interpreta ka 18 (Janma-marana) in his own way, and then refers to the traditional interpretation He gives a two-fold Interpretation of "liAgam' in kg 10, her arthan lingayan o lingam' being found for the art trae la , it was roadily accepted by the later commentators (See 1, J) Similarly betw is ka 10 is explained as both karaka (causal) and jupata (pogolthe) and the author of the Yuktidrolka makes a special effort to show that i knot jnapaka here In V,, on ka 2 the author quotes the verse
"Pancavitar-rattuajho yatra yatrasrame ratah,
prakrtljno vikarajnah sarvair duḥkhair vimucyate", lo which the second lino is different from the one ordinarily fowed
Jap mundi fikht vapt mucyato na'tra saklayam
It is not in vain that Karnakagomin holds that Dharmabinti la rela ring to 'Samkhya-Nasaka Madhava, when he says that some out of 80080 of ego make alterations in the traditional text landed down uolnterruptedly till then
(c) Jinendrabaddhl says that in the view of Kapita mudahan pleasure etc are everywhere one and the same, while to the wow of Madhava they are different everywhere Now, in the introductory p age * kg 12, only V, and following it the Mahara-optii stints a jotta # the effect that sattaa, rajas and tamas are not up
to the Samkhya holds that they are satyantaros'-) (no ha ettari jatyantarani) Now, this can be interpreted simply Marging that sets, rajas and tamas are not numerically different, but are didapen mapects of ono entity Hero the word Jar cannot be taken lo aay pocalitter but must be taken as signifying simply wipe - thome lo so small pablade In the gunas, they are not different entities. The Samilya ay that they ate different Or, 1 importance be attached to the use of the word 'And, this would mean they are not three differeat / The Stahya rejoida would be that they are different faris This would mea that there was many sattvas constituting a saltpa Jul, and so also with the other two Could Jinondrabuddbl be referring to this ?
(d) According to Santarakolta also, Medhan # 2 specimen of 10 Tanfaithful exponent who violates the tenets of bis Achool and this con. to somo oxtont, bo explained by what we have fou abort
| SR No. | 520751 |
| Book Title | Sambodhi 1972 Vol 01 |
| Original Sutra Author | N/A |
| Author | Dalsukh Malvania, H C Bhayani |
| Publisher | L D Indology Ahmedabad |
| Publication Year | 1972 |
| Total Pages | 416 |
| Language | English, Sanskrit, Prakrit, Gujarati |
| Classification | Magazine, India_Sambodhi, & India |
| File Size | 11 MB |