Jain Journal 2001 04

SR No.: 520142
Original Sutra Author: N/A
Author: Jain Bhawan Publication
Publisher: Jain Bhawan Publication
Publication Year: 2001
Total Pages: 92
Language: English
Classification: Magazine, India_Jain Journal, & India
File Size: 4 MB

Page 8

The date of Mahavira, like that of the Buddha, occupies a very important place in ancient Indian chronology; but it has not attracted as much attention of scholars as the date of the Buddha. Indeed after Jarl Charpentier considered the problem in the Indian Antiquity of 1914 and the Cambridge History of India, Volume I, in 1922, H.C. Seth was the only scholar to take it up seriously in recent times and suggest a new date based on the Buddhist tradition. We intend to suggest here a new date for Mahavira, but it is not completely new in the sense that it is based on the Buddhist tradition. We shall put this date to suitable tests with a view to examining its correctness. These tests will also, however, be based mainly on the Buddhist tradition itself which has rightly come to be regarded as very reliable for ancient Indian history.
Generally speaking, two dates of Mahavira's death hold the field. They are:
THE DATE OF MAHAVIRA
2.
3.
YOGENDRA MISHRA
(A) The date 527 B.C. is based on the tradition recorded by Merutunga, a famous Jaina author, who flourished in the fourteenth century. He gives as a basis for an adjustment between the Vira and Vikrama eras the famous verses, first quoted by Buhler5 and after him discussed by Jacobi. The English translation of the verses, which is taken from Buhler, is as follows:
4.
1. A.F.R. Hoernle, Proceedings of the Asiatic Society of Bengal, 1898, pp. 39ff.
5.
(A) 527 B.C. (Hoernle1, Guerinot?), and
(B) 467 B.C. (Jacobi3, Charpentier1).
Guerinot, Essai de Bibliographie Jaina, Paris 1906, p. VII.
H. Jacobi, Kalpa Sutra of Bhadrabahu, Leipzig, 1879; introductions to SBE, Vols. 22 (Oxford, 1884) and 45 (Oxford, 1895); 'On Mahavira and His Predecessors', Indian Antiquity, 9, 1880, pp. 156ff.
J. Charpentier, The Date of Mahavira', Ind. Ant., 1914, pp. 118-123, 125-133, 167-178; Chapter 6 in Cambridge History of India Vol. I (Cambridge, 1922), esp. pp. 155-156.
'Pushpamitra or Pushyamitra ?' in Ind. Ant., 2, pp. 362-363.