Page Text
________________
It can be seen from this table how almost all the relevant evidence converges in the case of, or can be accommodated in the frame of, the first identification. For what I consider to be the next best identification, only the boxed part of the convergence holds good. On the other hand, the 'parvata = Tri-kūta' identification rests only on the statement in the sīkā and this, too, when the original form of that statement is assumed to be different from what it is now.
Notes
*
Conclusions reached in this part were reported in the form of a short paper on 21 March 1983 at the 193rd meeting of the American Oriental Society held at Baltimore. The author was able to study many of the sources used in the article because of financial assistance provided at various times since 1969 by the University of B.C. Humanities and Social Sciences Research Committee, the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada, the Shastri Indo-Canadian Institute, the American Council of Learned Societies, and the Alexander von Humboldt Stiftung of the Federal Republic of Germany. I also wish to acknowledge the dispassionate response to my criticism of his position that Professor Hartmut Scharfe gave in his letter of 6 November 1987. The response based on the 26 October 1987 version of the paper helped me in clarifying some points and correcting a few errors.
23
| SR No. | 269664 |
| Book Title | Paninian Studies |
| Original Sutra Author | N/A |
| Author | Ashok Aklujkar |
| Publisher | Ashok Aklujkar |
| Publication Year | |
| Total Pages | 47 |
| Language | English |
| Classification | Article |
| File Size | 4 MB |