Judgement Dealing With Subject Of Slaughter Of Animals In Light Of Indian Constitution

SR No.: 269193
Original Sutra Author: N/A
Author: C K Chaturvedi
Publisher: Akhil Bharat Krishi Go Seva Sangh
Total Pages: 40
Language: English
Classification: Article
File Size: 8 MB

Page 36

each animal as unfit for milking purposes, breeding purposes and capable of being used as a draught cautio. Regime of a perficial examination is ng examination and is purely arbitrary and subiective, and likely to be under the influence and dictatos of business needs. Such machinery should be stationed at the slaughter house itself. Additional duties of such a machinery should be to see that provisions of Prevention of Cruelty to Animal are followed, while treating animals, when unloaded, kopt outsido slaughter house, and when these are actually slaughtered, to soo that no unnecessary pain or suffering is caused, and people ignoring the law are prosecuted and punished. This is particularly necessary in view of the following factors mentioned in a work of CLINICAL VETERINARY TEXICOLOGY AND JURISPRUDENCE, (published by Anubha Prakashan, 351 Booharbagh, Jabalpur, M.P.)
The fraudulent dealers Invariably play mischief while selling the livestock. These dealers try to alter the identity of the animals and thus their description is changed. This is as follows:
Changing colour of the body by bleaching or by dying with a colouring dyo by which the gray colour becomes black.
Entire males aro castrated.
In caso of horses the mane and tail is clipped.
Decking of tail may be done
5.
Rasping of horns are done to disturb the age of the animals.
6.
They oven trim the horns or change the direction of the horns.
151. Now when there is no denial of the fact by MCDthal Narela is a populated area, and in itself is a completo zone of MCD, and when it is not also in dispute that prosont proposal is to construct the Slaughter House at Narela in collaboration with the Govrnment of Hungary, the irresistable conclusion is that construction of Slaughter House in Narola will be in violation of Delhi High Court Judgement in Civil Writ No. 2267/90, in which the Hon'ble High Court has directed to construct a slaughter house in an area away from the city, which is not populated. As a result, the suit of the plaintiffs is to be decreed. As already stated MCD functions under the Policy Control of Central Government, in the Ministry of Agriculture, Ministry of Environment etc. under a Central statute who have chosen to remain as 'ON LOOKER' not only in this suit, but also a muto specialor to
dance of death in the Slaughter House, the suit is to be decreed against them principally with suitable directions.
152.
This Order is, therefore, divided in two parts.
Summary
of Sugestions
a.
Union of India should define very sharply the conditions and circumstances in which alone animals could be destroyed for 'food. This is suggested so that greed based economic ambition linked, killings and killing otherwise for whatever trade etc. are replaced by Need based killings, in a manner which is consistent with the harmonious coexistence of man and animal kingdom, as both are mutually interdependent in environment rather than independent. Much of the killings today are in the name of food for taste etc, rather than for sake of food.
35