Marathi - Latche marathi Aetihasik Lekh Part 02

SR No.: 034932
Original Sutra Author: N/A
Author: Vidyanand Swami Srivastava
Publisher: Aietihasik Gaurava Granthmala
Publication Year: 1937
Total Pages: 172
Language: Marathi
Classification: Book_Other
File Size: 11 MB

Page 37

27
with the Bagatias of Tuna, Asha & Nawali, who are acknowledged relations of Miyangam and Devan Bahgatias. It is strange to see that attempt has been made to disown Kusalsingh, whose Grand son Parbatsingh was the son in law of Baria Thakur Ranmalsingh of Miyangam, while most of his property is enjoyed by Madvi and its collateral
The eagerness of the authour of these tables as well as of those who caused their preparation, in disowning Khusalsingh and denying any relation with him, is betrayed. They wanted to conceal some facts related to Kusalsingh' family. That fact was his relation with Miyagam. Being thus confronted they shifted their realtion from Khusalsingh to Yograj but there too faced with the same dificultyi, they attempted to attribute_realtion of Devan only to Sursingh and afterwards showed him issueless. In our humble opinion they totally failed in thier attempt
With these wards we reject these tables originated from Bhar uababa and proceed with the examination of other tables.
Bombay Gazzetter' Table,
This Table commences with one Mooldeva as the originator of the house and put at the 6 steps Udaisingh I. The three intervening names are that of Khandhaldeva, Baldeva and Karandeva. These names are identical with that of Umargam Table no. "4,2". Beyond this there is material difference between these two, as this table mentions only one son of Molkarn the sixth. Raja. While the Umargam Table, as shown in the preceding Paragraph, gives eight sons to him. Further on this table is reliable as it gives only the names of Historical persons known to all. However it omits one name of Parbatsingh who had actuaaly ruled over Barsda for some time.
Other Tables.
Besides these tables quoted above and dealt seperately there three more Tables Viz Manubhai, Adbhavaryu and Ambegamkar. These tables are repeatition of one or other therefore deserv no attention at all at our hands.
OUR. OWN. TABLE.
We have prepared this table on the authourity of authouritative doccuments. It commeces with Raibhan I and goes downward till the