Page Text
________________
50
saving the student community from harassment and exploitation. Holding of such common entrance test followed by centralised counselling or, in other words, single-window system regulating admissions does not cause any dent in the right of minority unaided educational institutions to admit students of their choice. Such choice can be exercised from out of the list of successful candidates prepared at CET without altering the order of merit inter se of the students so chosen.
137. Pai Foundation has held that minority unaided institutions can legitimately claim unfettered fundamental right to choose the students to be allowed admission and the procedure therefor subject to its being fair, transparent and non-exploitative. The same principle applies to nonminority unaided institutions. There may be a single institution imparting a particular type of education which is not being imparted by any other institution and having its own admission procedure fulfilling the test of being fair, transparent and non-exploitative. All institutions imparting same or similar professional education can join together for holding a common entrance test satisfying the abovesaid triple tests. The State can also provide a procedure of holding a common entrance test in the interest of securing fair and merit-based admissions and preventing maladministration. The admission procedure so adopted by a private institution or group of institutions, if it fails to satisfy all or any of the triple tests, indicated hereinabove, can be taken over by the State substituting its own procedure. The second question is answered accordingly. 138. It needs to be specifically stated that having regard to the larger interest and welfare of the student community to promote merit, achieve excellence and curb malpractices, it would be permissible to regulate admissions by providing a centralised and singlewindow procedure. Such a procedure, to a large extent, can secure grant of merit-based admissions on a transparent basis. Till regulations are framed, the Admission Committees can oversee admissions so as to ensure that merit is not the casualty."
HO
(emphasis supplied)
(d) To use its properties and assets for the benefit of the institution. The management of a minority educational institution can use properties and assets of an educational institution for its future development as also its expansion.
Mode of instruction
A particular State can validly take a policy decision to compulsorily teach its regional language. (See English Medium Students Parent Association vs. State of Karnataka
2028
Minority
| SR No. | 034376 |
| Book Title | Minority Benefits |
| Original Sutra Author | N/A |
| Author | Babita Jain |
| Publisher | Shrut Samvardhan Samsthan |
| Publication Year | 2017 |
| Total Pages | 250 |
| Language | English |
| Classification | Book_English |
| File Size | 13 MB |