________________ inauspicious, or a loathsome meaning'. It is thus of three types, (i) Aslilartha (ii) Amangalartha and (iii) Ghynavad-artha. The first variety is further divided into Asabhyartha, Asabhyarthantara and Asabhyasmyti-hetu. The ill. of Asabhyarthantara is (P. 10), 1.7): vidyam abhyasyato ratrav eti yabhavatah priya / vanita-guhya-kesanam katham te pelabandhanam // The ill. of Asabhya-smyti-hetu is not traceable in Viveka. Amangalartha type of Aslila also is divided by Bhoja into three varieties viz., Asastartha, Asastarthantara and Asasta-smyli-hetu. The ill. of Asastarthantara is (P. 10, 1. 8): pravasayati ya kantam vasante grha-samsthitam vinasapathadanena pisaci sa na cangana 1/5 The ill. of Asasta-smyti-hetu is (P. 10, 1. 10): marico 'yam munir yasya kylya kalantakalaye/ patnyam sankrandanadinam sutanam aptaye 'bhavan li The third variety of Gramya viz., Ghynavad-artha, is further divided into three types : Ghynavad artha, Ghynavad -arlhantara and Ghrnavatsmyti-hetu. The ill. of the second variety is not traceable here. The ill, of the third variety is (P. 10, 1. 13): * pratyardayanto rud hani madanesu-vranani nah / hydayam kled ayanty ete purisanda-mahaddruma) // After this, the exceptions to this dosa, as stated by Bhoja, are given. (P. 10, 1. 14): gramyam ghynavad aslilamangalartham yadiritam / tatsamvitesu guplesu laksitesu na dusyati //? Which means, according to Viveka, that the first, the second and the third varieties of the three types of Gramya are faultless when they are 1. S. K. I. 14, 2. The last two varieties are the same as Vamana's varieties of Aslila noted above. Vamana does not give Asabhyartha as a variety of Aslila, as it is too obvious (Vivek P. 8, 1. 26). Probably Kalpalata does not give its illustration for the same reason. 3. S. K. I. v. 17. 4. This is Vamana's Amangalatankadayi, and the last two varieties of Amangala given by Bhoja correspond to Amangalarthantara and Amangala-smoti-hetu of Vamana. 5. S. K, I. v. 20. 6. S. K. I. v. 24. 7. S. K. I. 105.