Kalplata Vivek

SR No.: 032756
Original Sutra Author: N/A
Author: Murari Lal Nagar, Harishankar Shastry
Publisher: L D Indology Ahmedabad
Publication Year: 1968
Total Pages: 550
Language: Hindi, Sanskrit
Classification: Book_Devnagari
File Size: 15 MB

Page 169

160 . (56) Visesa (p. 286, 1. 6): At the end of his discussion of this figure Mammata remarks that Atisayokti is always present in such cases as it is the life of such alamkaras. Then he quotes Bhamaha 1. (57) Tadguna (p. 286, 1. 7) Rudrata's definition of his first variety of this figure is descussed ?. (58) Atadguna (p. 286, 1. 11). Mainmata's ill. of this figure is discussed.' (59) Vyaghala (p. 286, 1. 11) : Not quite traceable. (60) Rasavat (p, 286, 1. 13): A long discussion of this figure including that of Rasa is given. The original borrows wholesale from Bharata's Nat ya- sastra, Abhinavabharati ? and Hemacandra's Viveka s. (61) Preyas (p. 317, 1. 19.): Udbhata's definition of the figure is probably discussed in the end. 10 (62) Urjasvi (p. 317, 1. 25): Bhamaha's ill. of this figure is: (Urjasvi) Karnena yatha Parthaya punaragatah / 1. The original borrowrs from K. P. : सर्वत्र एवंविधविषयेऽतिशयोक्तिरेव प्राणत्वेनावतिष्ठते, तांविना प्रायेणालंकारत्वायोगात् / अत एवउक्तम् - सैषा सर्वत्र वक्रोक्तिः etc. / B. K. L. II. 85. Hemacandra includes Visama in Atisayokti, with these remarks: एवं विधे च सर्वत्र विषयेऽतिशयोक्तिरेव प्राणत्वेनावतिष्ठते। तां विना प्रायेणालंकरणत्वायोगादिति न सामान्यमीलितकावलीनिदर्शनाविशेषाद्यलंकारोपन्यासः (p. 371). 2. यस्मिन्नेकगुणानामर्थानां योगलक्ष्यरूपाणाम् / संसर्गेसति मानावं म लक्ष्यते तन्दुणः स इति / R. K. L. IX. 22. Viveka paraphdases Nami. New paragraph from here. 4. गाङ्गमम्बु सितमम्बु यामुनं कज्जलाभमुभयत्र मज्जतः / राजहंस तव सैव शुभ्रता चीयते न च न चापचीयते // K. P. x. v. 566. Hemacandra includes it in Virodha (H. K. S.-(p. 377). 6. cp. Viveka pp. 286 to 302 and Natya-Sastra (Nisnaya Sagar Ed). pp. 113 to 129. 7 n Viveka(p. 302, 1.21 ff) and Abhinava-bharati on Natya-sastra ch VI. cp. Viveka (p. 302, 1, 21 ff) and Hemacandra's Viveka (p. 91 ff). I have traced the sources mentioned in foot-notes 4, 5, and 5, line for line, but they are not set out in detail here. This figure is accepted by Bhamaha, Dandi, Udbhata. Anandvardhana and others. Mammata and Hemacandra do not accept it. They include it in गुणीभूतव्यङ्गय, [vide K. P. (p. 88 and H. K. S.-P. 404)]. 10. The original here borrows from Induraja: तदेषा रत्यादिकानां मावानां पञ्चाशत्संख्यानां यान्यनुभावादिभिश्चतु : संख्यै : समस्तत्वेन व्यस्तत्वेन च यथायोगं सूचनानि etc./ (p. 48.) The words रत्यादिभावानामिति / and सूचनानि इति। in Viveka should be m thick black types.