Kalplata Vivek

SR No.: 032756
Original Sutra Author: N/A
Author: Murari Lal Nagar, Harishankar Shastry
Publisher: L D Indology Ahmedabad
Publication Year: 1968
Total Pages: 550
Language: Hindi, Sanskrit
Classification: Book_Devnagari
File Size: 15 MB

Page 164

155 (p. 284, 1. 13) The verse under discussion probably is: anuragavati sandhya divasas tal purahsarah / aho daiva-gatih kidTk-tatha'pi na samagamah 1/1 Here the context (prakarana) is not known hence it is not possible to say what is praksla and what is apraksta. The figure of speech is either samasokti or aprastutaprasansa. It is a variety of Ahetu according to Bhoja. (38) Parisankhya (p. 284, 1. 16): Mammatas definition of the figure is discussed. * The ill. under discussion is: kim asevyam pumsam, savidham anavadyam dyu-saritah / 6 etc. (p. 284, 1. 18) Rudratas ills. of Parisankhya are discussed : kautilyam kaca.nicaye / etc. and kim sukham a paratantryam / etc.? Rudrata divides each of the two varieties of Parisankhya viz. Prsta and Aprsta, into four subvarieties according as the exclusion relates in each case to jali, guna, kriya or dravya. S The ills. of guna only in both the main types is given by Rudrata. Namisadhu points out the ill. of the exclusion of jati in the first i.e. thrsta type of Parisankhya. It is slightly elaborated by Viveka (p. 284, 1. 23): ke brahmana yesas satyam dama anisamsyam / o etc. Viveka does not illustrate the other subvarieties of Parikara. 10. The verse is quoted in E 121 (P. 114). 2. The figure is Samasokti according to Bhamaha and Aksepa according to Vamana (Vide 5199 - P. 115). 3. S. K. III. v. 44. (P. 332) and Sr. Pr. Vol. II. (P. 397). 4. K. P. X. 119. (P. 544). The original borrows from K. P, : TATUT+Tatana ar शब्देन प्रतिपादितम् etcI P.:44. 5. K, P. X v. 522. 6. R. K, L. VII 8!. and K. P. X. v. 524, Mammatas third variety of Of Tel. : 7. R, K L. VII. EO. The order of Rudrata's ills, of parisankhya is changed in Kalpalata, because they are given according to K. P. Rudrata's ill. of the second variety of parisankhya is Mammata's ill. of the shird variety of that figure, whereas the former's ill. of the first variety of parisankhya is not quoted by Mammata. 8. कारणमाला सेयं यत्र यथा पूर्वमेति कारणताम् / a fai qalafzaata hala Il R, K, L, VII. 79. 9. rat a le ai facile 2014 l'anny on R, K, L, VII. 80. 10. Viveka (P. 284, 1. 25) remarks : gg Gifagaafaitaiyaretch | Namisadbu also does not supply the remaining ills.. He remarks : 591fag a feladati (vide factor on R, K, L. VII. 81).