________________ 149 Some of the ills. are traceable 1 (29) Bhavika (p. 278, 1. 18) : Mammatas definition of is discussed. Bhavika s (p. 278, 1. 20) The first variety of Bhavika* according to Bhoja is discussed. Bhojas Bhavika is quite different from the one defined by Bhamabas and others. The threefold Udbheda, 6 another alamkara according to some, is included by Bhoja in his Bhavika. Bhavika' is (p. 278, 1. 21) Bhojas ill. of the second varietiey of treated here. The ill. of the third variety is not traceable. (p. 278, 1. 22) The ill. of the vyakta type of Udbheda" is under discussion. (p. 278, 1. 23) The ill. of ubhaya-rupa Udbheda, 1deg is discussed. The ill. of the second variety of Udbheda, 11 avyakta type is not traceable. 1. The ill. of व्यत्ययवती मुख्या : कुमुदवनमपनि श्रीमदम्भाजषण्डम् etc. s. K. III. V. 78 (शिशु० XI. 68.) The ill. of Buch of that type is : जो ती अ अहरराभो रत्तिं उब्वासिओ पिअअमेण / सोच्चिय दोसइ गोसे सवत्तिअणेसु सङ्कन्तो // S. K. III. v. 79. The ill. विनिमयवती अमुख्या is: तस्य च प्रवयसो जटायुषः स्वगिणः etc. / (ibid.) III. v. 81. The original borrows from Bhoja: अत्र जर्जरकलेवरं दत्त्वा...यशः क्रोतमित्यमुख्ययै वृत्त्या etc. / (P. 350). The ill. of उभयवती अमुख्या is: S. K. III. v. 83. The original borrows from Bhoja. भत्र भुभृताम्... हस्तनिक्षेप स एव ( in विवेक it is एष) द्रव्यगुणादीनां स्थानादिपरिबृत्ती व्यत्यो, यञ्च...सोऽयं दानप्रतिपादनलक्षणोपि विनिमयः etc. I ( P. 351). 2. New paragraph from the words: परोक्षोपलणपरत्वे इति / 3. K. P. X. 28: प्रत्यक्षा इव यद्भावाः क्रियन्ते भूतभाविनः / तद्भाविकम् // This is based on Bhimaha's definition of Bhavika (vide B. K. L. III. 53) [vide also U. K. L. S. VI. (P. 73)]. The original borrows from Hemacandra: भूतभाविशब्दस्य परीक्षोपलक्षणपरत्वे परोक्षाणां पुरःस्फुरद्रपत्वहेतुवर्णनमिति etc. / H. K. S.V. (P. 403), 4. S.K. IV.v. 232. 5. (ibid) IV 86. 6. (ibid) IV. 8. 7. (ibid) IV. v. 233. 8. (ibid) S. K. IV v. 234. 9. (ibid) IV. v. 235. The original borrows here from Bhoja's comments on this verse: अत्र मायाविनो महेन्द्रस्याभिप्रायः सत्यकेन व्यक्तमेवो भदन्न इति व्यक्तोऽयमुझ्देदः। P. 550 10. (ibid) IV. v. 237. The original borrows here from Bhoja's comments: सोऽयं सखीव्याहास्तेन तदभिप्राय उम्दिन्नोऽनुभिदन्न च भवतीत्युभयरूपोऽयमुभ्देदः / P. 551.