Kalplata Vivek

SR No.: 032756
Original Sutra Author: N/A
Author: Murari Lal Nagar, Harishankar Shastry
Publisher: L D Indology Ahmedabad
Publication Year: 1968
Total Pages: 550
Language: Hindi, Sanskrit
Classification: Book_Devnagari
File Size: 15 MB

Page 151

142 vanechranam vanita-sakhanam darl-glhotsanga-nisakta-bhasah | bhavanti yatrausadhayo rajanyam ataila-purah surata-pradipah // Here the lamps were burning without an external cause (viz fuel, oil), hence spontaneity (svabhavikatva) is presumed. (21) Visesoktia (p. 271, 1. 23) : Bhamaha's definition of the figure is discussed. 3 (p. 272, 1. 1) Visesokli is explained probably from Mammata's point of view.* (p. 272, 1. 4) Bhoja's ill. of Visesokti involving deficiency of things (dravya.vaikalya) is : na ratha na ca matanga na haya na ca pattayah / strinam apanga.drst yaiva jiyate jagatam trayam // 5 (p. 272, 1. 6) The ill. of Visesokti having deficient things is : eka-cakro ratho yanta vikalo visama hayah / etc. (p. 272, 1. 8) Bhoja's ill. of Visesokti is discussed ; ayar taya ratha-ksobhad amsenannso nipiditah: /? etc. Here there is Visesokti even though there is no deficiency. (p. 272, 1, 14) Bhoja's definition of the figure Ahetus, a distinct figure according to him, is discussed. It seems to have been included under Visesokti by Kalpalata. (p. 272, 1. 17 )' Bhoja includes Karana-malalo under Ahetu, 11 which latter is not considered distinct from Visesokti by the author of Kalpalata. 1. (ATT. I. 10), S. K. III. v. 18. (cf. R. K. L. IX. 17). 2. A new paragraph from here. 3. (vide) B. K. L. III. 23. 4. The words ertog etc, occur in K. P. too. But the original seems to draw upon some other source. 5. S. K. IV. v. 168. (cp. K, D. II. 327.). The original (P. 272, 1. 4) borrows from Bhoja : egtera aisfy facc i ai S. K. IV. 70 cd. 6. S. K. IV. v. 169. (cf K. D. II. 328). The original borrows from Bhoja's vitti on this verse : Anafaqala strega ETREGOUT Ararazifastolfen: I P. : 06. 7. (Vikrama. III, 11.) S. K. IV. v. 170. The original borrows from Bhoja's vrtti : वैकल्यदर्शनेऽपि विशेषस्तेनैषा हेतुमत्यपि हेतुमता विशेष्यमाणा यथोक्ता विशेषोक्तिर्भवति / या पुनरहोर्वश्यामितो वाक्याग्दुणादिवैशिष्ट्यावगतिः सा पर्यायोक्तिर्न विशेषोक्तिः। (P. 507).. 8. वस्तुनो वा स्वभावेन शक्तेर्वा हानिहेतुना। 3751 #10: REGIEat T: 01 S. K. III, 18. Rudrata treats Ahetu as an independent figure (vide R, K, L, IX, 54). 9. The paragraphing is unwarrantable here. 10. S. K. III, 19 and 20. Rudrata defines and illustrates this figure for the first time, (R. K. L. VII, 84). 11. S. K. III, 19 : " asteala faydi"