Epigraphia Indica Vol 32

SR No.: 032586
Original Sutra Author: N/A
Author: D C Sircar, B Ch Chhabra,
Publisher: Archaeological Survey of India
Publication Year: 1957
Total Pages: 512
Language: English
Classification: Book_English
File Size: 33 MB

Page 237

No: 19]
KALYANA INSCRIPTION OF SULTAN MUHAMMAD, SAKA 1248 167
Malla, son of Vainasimha or Vainapala, who was in charge of the management of the temple. The request was granted by the governor in consultation with his secretary. The governor is stated to have given the verdict that as it (i.e. worship in the temple) was the religious duty of the petitioners, they should follow it (lines 11-14).
Then come four verses, all in the Särdülavikriḍita metre. In verse 1 the Sultan is mentioned as Mahimada. Verses 1-2 together summarise the main facts stated before. The only additional information furnished by them is that the said Malla was a Kayastha and that the installation of the deity took place according to the prescribed rites such as the chanting of the mantras at night during the Rōhiņi nakshatra. It is interesting to note that on the date cited previously the Krittikä nakshatra lasted till 34, followed by Rohini thereafter. Verse 3 seems to allude to the Puranic episode of the destruction of the Three Cities by the god Siva. Verse 4 praises the deity Madhukesvara, i.e. Siva, as the supreme god and invokes his blessings. In the prose passage that follows (lines 29-30) is introduced Vijäditya who wrote (i.e. drafted) the charter. He is described as one respected by Syara Sihada-raja who appears to have been an officer of some importance, probably a prince of the royal family. It is not unlikely that he is identical with Syära Mallika mentioned in line 8. This Vijäditya appears to have been a person of some learning, though his composition has been spoiled by the ignorant engraver. The last two lines (31-32) are damaged. Line 31 again refers to Thakura and Madhukēsvara.
The inscription is of unique historical importance. The ruling king introduced as Mahārājādhirāja-śrī-Suratāņa must no doubt be Sultan Muhammad Shah bin Tughluq. The epithet Suratana is a Prakrit form of Suratrāņa (cf. lines 14-15) which is a Sanskritised form of Sultān. Muhammad Shah's accession took place a few days after the death of his father Ghiyas-ud-din Tughluq in February or March 1325 A.D. The areas around Kalyana might have been annexed by Muhammad Shah himself in the course of his campaigns against Warangal and Bidar during the life-time of his father when he was acting as the viceroy of the southern provinces under his original name Ulugh Khan. Our inscription dated 1326 A.D. falls in the second year of Muhammad Shah's reign. It thus furnishes the earliest epigraphic evidence so far known for the reign of the king."
1 This name is spelt as Mala in one place and Malla in two places. Similarly, the family name Thakkura given alternately as Thakura and Thakura and perhaps wrongly as Takura also.
* The name of this secretary appears to be Jarhdadasa (lines 12-13). It is not unlikely that the same person is mentioned as Jamḍamala in line 8 immediately after Shōja Ahamada. Compare the name of Mulla's father mentioned with variations as Vainapala (line 12) and Vaipasimha (line 17).
Sihädä may be a corrupt form of Shahjädä, meaning a prince.
• Cambridge History of India, Vol. II, p. 135.
Aiyangar, South India and Her Muhammadan Invaders, 1921, pp. 133-34.
It is interesting to note that two inscriptions associated with the Sultan are found in the ec uth. One of them, in Persian, from Rajahmundry is dated September 12, 1324 A.D. (Sewell and Aiyangar, Historical Inscriptions, etc., p. 182). But it is clear that Muhammad Shah was not the reigning king at that time. As the record mentions the name Muhammad Shah which was assumed by the Sultan after his accession, it is possible to think that the epigraph was set up later in his reign. The second one is dated in his ninth year (1334 A.D.) and comes from Panaiyur in the former Pudukotta State (Aiyangar, op. cit., p. 153).