Epigraphia Indica Vol 11

SR No.: 032565
Original Sutra Author: N/A
Author: E Hultzsch
Publisher: Archaeological Survey of India
Publication Year: 1911
Total Pages: 438
Language: English
Classification: Book_English
File Size: 22 MB

Page 336

THE PARIKUD PLATES OF MADHYAMARAJADEVA.
No. 28.]
16 dho-pi subhais-charittrair-mrishta [h] kalamka [h] Kalidarppapasya [8] Jatotha tasya tanaya [s]-sukriti (ti) samasta-simanti (nti)
17 ni-nayana-ahat pada-pandarika[b] [*] śri-Sainyabhita
iti bhumi (mi)-patir=
mmahebha-kumbha-sta (stha)li-dalana-d[u]
18 rllali(i)-aidhars[b], [19] Kalayair-bhata-dhätri(tri)-patibhir-upachit-Anni(ne)kapap-ava [t]arai[r]=ni(ni) ta(ta) yesa (sha)m ka [th-a]pi pra19 layam-abhimatā ki[r]tti-s(p)lair-ajaira(srn) [d] prabhṛitibhir-amara lambhitas-[tr]i(tri) ptim-u20 rvvi(rv)[m-nddri]pt-äräti-pakaba-kabaya-kriti-patană Tasy-otkhat-Akhil-Kre[r]-mmarad-iva a
21 vanau(?) bhasvad-ushka-tējā1 si(su)ro māni Yasobhita-devas-tanija [h] | matangan-yo-ti (ti)tu22 gi[n]-va(ba)ba [la]-madamnchaé-chiru-vaktra-prachandab karshaty a[]vina punar-api tapati ya[a]-nata[s]
va(ba)dva(ddhva) pragalbba[b] [11]
23 Ke chid-vahnya (nya)-mrigēna sarddham=achi (cha ?)rams-tas-ta sthiti (ti) li(li)laya ko ohi[ch-ch-[0]rddh[*]a-mukhas-sahaara-kirapa-jväl-ā
285
24 vali-prekshana (pa)[h*] [*] Kō chid-vashka (lka)linas-tath-ajina-dhara[ḥ*] ke chirj-joj-ja)ta-dhåriga (p) [n]áná-ru (ra)pa-dharis-tapant yati
25 på divy-aspa[d]-[k]a[n]kshina [h*] [li 12] Ke chit-sela 3-guh-ödareshu [12] Ko dhvali-pai(yi)na[b] anys vyu-phal
28 tā
Jajñala-tair-Avamādha
Srinivāsēna yena | [10]
dayalu[r]=narapati[sha"]
26 mvn(mba)-bhaksha-nirata[b ko] chi[n-nl] (uni)råhärakâ[b] [itha yoga-yugos vihaya vasati dh[y]ayanti divyam padam chittram
27 Madhyamarajadēva-guna-dhrid-rajya[m] pitu[h] prăptava [n] | [13] [13] YasyKhva(hv)nän-mama[d*]yu[*]-aura-bhavana-ga
divya-[t]tv[b]
niyata
Second Plate; Second Side.
nityakalam
pragalbhas | tai[a]-tarddha[m] (u)kri[ta]-gupa-kath-pa-hridya(dy)[b] prakarvva[n] [1] Sambbo[]
Read ittham,
• Read -yujo.
This sign of punctuation is superfluous.
One would expect hṛidya-sukrita-guna-kath-äläpän,
Read param. The missing syllables may be sasvayum.
[th]
29 sthana-kāri padam-amarajava [h] sasvata [m] santa-rupaṁ lavdh (bdh)-ötsaha[s]-sa vira [h] kshititala-vasati (ti)m nirjjit-ārā
30 ti-paksha[b] [14]
Sthity-upta(tpa) [*]ti-[v]ināša-kirapa-parama -vyahata[m] vyakt-Avyaktam-ananta-sakti niyntah d[e]váci
31 děvō maha[][] tasy-anugrahakari-vikrama-dhanu[*]-choshṭa[m] adbhuta[] ariman atala[*]-§néätkä(Aka)dhavala-kah
1 Read -ushyamsu-tējās.
It would suit the exigencies of metrical purposes if the two syllables baddhva came after afvena; but purport would still be indefinite.
Read chich-chhailar.
jyo
karōty=