Descriptive Catalogue Of Manuscripts Vol 17 Part 05

SR No.: 018111
Original Sutra Author: N/A
Author: Parshuram Krishna Gode
Publisher: Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute
Publication Year: 1954
Total Pages: 330
Language: English
Classification: Catalogue & Catalogue
File Size: 19 MB

Page 46

I] Index of Author's
15 Śyama Sûrit :
Prajña panāsūtra 214-219 -Śricandra Sûri alias Parśvadeva Gaņis, pupil of Dhaneśvara
Sūri, pupil of Silabhadra Sûri : Nandisútravivaraṇadurgapadavyākhya 620 Nirayāvalikāśrutaskandhavyākhyā ( com. ) 256–261 Niśithasütracürşivimśoddeśakavyakhyā4 (com. ) 449-451
Pindavisuddhivștti ( com.) 414 sŚrītilaka Sūrio :
Āvaśyakasūtralaghuvștti ( com.)7 1081-1086 Śrītilaka Sūri, devotee of Dhaneśvara Sûri ( acc. to the
printed edn. ): Jitakalpasūtravivaraṇalava ( com. )8 592 Śrītilaka Sūri :
Caityavandanasútravịttio ( com. ) 847, 848 Pratyākhyānavrtti (com. ) 1272", 1273
Vandanakasūtravivarana ( com. )': 857 Śritilaka Súri :
Yatipratikramaņasútravyākhyāna" ( com. ) 971,972
1 He is said to bave died in Vira Samvat 376.
% There is one Sricandra Suri who is pupil of Vira Gani of Candra kula and who is guru of Yasodova Suri who oomposed cūrni on Pascasaka (I) in Samvat 1172.
• See p. 8.
• This is dated as Saívat 1173. See SHJL (p. 243). Its author is montioned as pupil of Silabhadra in No. 449 ("ends").
S Devamurti who composed in Saka 1320 (i. e, Sarvat 1455 ) Kşetrasamāsa along with a com, is a great-grand-disciple of Srītilaka of Paurņamiya gaccha. Is this Sritilaka same as one mentioned here! Or is he a pupil of Devabhadra Suri, pupil of Abhayadeva suri, the founder of Rudrapalliya gaccha or is he the guru of Rajasekhara Suri who composed Pañjika on Nyāyakandali ?
6 In SHIL (p. 849 ) he is named as Tilaka Suri, and works here noted by: me under various Sūris having the same name (Sritilaks') are attributed to him. I however think that the correct name in almost all these cases is Śrītilaka. For in Nos. 592 (p. 267 ), 847 ( p. 232 ), 974 (p. 334 ), 1081 (p. 440 ) and 1272 (p. 111 ) we have staflast and in Nos. 931 and 975 " sigla IFF.
si ", though in Nos. 857 (p. 240 ) and 971 (p. 330 ) we have miqsa. Can both the śris be honorifio ?
1-18 It remains to be ascertained whether the authors of these works ato difforent or not.