________________
ADDENDA
PART I No. 5, page 6. According to the printed report the Ms. No. 81 of 1872-73 contains Acarängasutra-balavab.dha whereas No. 84 of 1872-73, Avašyak ısūtra. Further, the Ms. No. 81 of 1872-73, is recorded as lost in the Govt. report. But the Ms. No. 84 of 1872-73 contains Acarangasatra along with its balavabodha ( foll. 158). So Avasya kasaira must have been lost.
No. 9, page 11. Reference. — Add : This cūrni is published by " Rşabhadevaji Keśarimalaji Svetāmbara Samsthā”, Rutlam, in Vikrama Samvat 1998.
No. 46, page 46. Reference. – Add : This vårtika is published. See No. 28.
No. 48, page 48. Reference. - Add : An article named as “The Sūtrakstānga-niryakti” by Dr. A. M. Ghatage is published in the “ Indian Historical Quarterly ” ( Vol. XII, No. 2, pp. 270-281 ).
No. 51, page 50. Add : Reference. - This cürņi is published by R. K. S'. Samsthă, Rutlam, in Vikrama Samvat 1998.
No. 92, page 88. Reference. — Add : This commentary is published. See No. 87.
No. 97, page 92. Subject — Add : As this work does not contain all the 36 verses, the word "khanda " is used before “ şaţtrimśikā ".
No. 219, page 202. Add in No. 219 : N. B.- For further particulars see No. 218.
No. 221, page 204. Reference - Add : This commentary is published in two parts: pt. I by R, K. S'. Samstha in A. D. 1947 and pt. II by “ Jaina-pustaka-pracāraka-samsthā", Surat, in A. D. 1949.
No. 241, page 223. Subject - Add : In the printed edition (p. 2 ) of Pran:eyaratnamañjaşa it is stated that Malayagiri Sūri's commentary on Jambūdvipaprajñapti is lost, but, fortunately, it is now available in one of the bhandaras at Jesalmere.
1 In other relevant cases, too, a similar addition should be made. 36 (J.L. P)
