________________
92
TIC ORIENT
philosophy and ethics have not received that critical evaluation which could make it ever fresh and living It has semaineri static
One great contribution of Mahavia is his theory of 71012absolutism in thought speech and deed (Anekantavada Waynvada Samata) Such an approach leads to tolerance (Sambhava) chauty of heart and humility Thaoproach in a vay, is another form or aspect of the principle of non-nal". Principle of non-injury becomes trucly pficciive in action, nl if there is a spirit of non-violence in thright andi srcech 1 one is dogmatic or intolerant or harbous halled is bound to result in violence of speech and action This spirit of nonabsolutism leads to synthesis of opposite viens or at least it leads to respect for each other's yieus and secling of fellowship
Mahavila s principles of Ahimsa Aparigraha and anekanta have greater value, and are of great need in the modern world than they were some 2500 years ago Mahavira's principle of Samyam has greater relevance now than ever before. Man needs to learn self restraint in thought, word and deed against licence and intolerance which is so widespread nowadays. These principles can be the basis of true democracy socialism and peace Their application to the conditions of modern life cannot be the same as it was in Maharna's time Every great man is conditioned by his time and its needs Life is too great and complex to remain in straight jacket for all time to come It demands ever new synthesis from the contiadictions it evolves and creates Faith has to be renewed to be living. Spirit may remain the same, but it needs new forms Free thought is the breath of life Jainism is no exception to the need for critical re-examination of its practices to suit the needs of modern life
These are stray thoughts They have been germinating in my mind since years but I have had neither the time nor the ability for a deep and sustained study for a systematic exposi
on They are necessarily incomplete and I crave indulgence of the learned, if I have misunderstood them I am neither dogmatic about these views nor do I have a closed mind I would be content if they lead to a fruitful dialogue