Doctrine of Jainas

SR No.: 011097
Original Sutra Author: N/A
Author: Walther Shubring, Wolfgang Beurlen
Publisher: Motilal Banarasidas
Publication Year: 1978
Total Pages: 309
Language: English
Classification: Book_English
File Size: 17 MB

Page 178

164
DOCTRINPor Ti JAIXAS also in the Thān, Jiv 7311; Desi G), the subject is characterised by the words II valla radu suza. "from sundpoint it is predicable that. "i The word sisā sliding for viselfind occurung in pairs and ripeatrally in the firun of 1937 ereza siya sāsaya siya asīsajā, vay 30?.:) h.:s lyrcotic the fixosfor the thcory of the cause vlidity of any statement But now, apart from the word sal, the neauon ain) 191;! is significant of the seven formulac of the, szcd-rida which will be mentionce presently But just as the formule ortaom si flour trily sphere of the Syädvada already so clocoalin," in the cercursions rcndcrcd by Pannav. 3236 fi; Imon 74 IT Irom ilymo laikas we may take as an cwmple thut of more dual of equilent clements (cg an aggregate consisting of min toms) eludes obscrvation from the view of the mequence" (art.2371,c. that it lics "bycyond what is predicable" /ceste ni attainar), since this dunl is neither a sequence as if the case will thirrc atoms and morc nor nonc as rith one atom. While this the building stones of the Südküda arrcrestent in the Cononalready, yet the latter is still unaware of the completed buildm bcaring this name or that of llc Anchintivida. Most certainly thic invention of thus thcory of relativities (as it is frequently called in a somcwhat playful manner) gous back in in carks time, probably to Malāvīra personally, but in its fully developed shape as the so-called sapla-bhangi it appears only later as an anony. mous crcation As to its origin SCHRADER, who nouced the relation with the vihalpa of thic Ājnīnika, pointed to the logics of the southern Indian Digambaris de cloped in shroud dulcuc argumentations. The sapla-bhangi says that an object (a ghala, of course) scen from a chosen standpoint (synīt) can be significd (1) as cxistent, (2) as non-existent (1 c rcgarded under the aspect of another object) and (3) as both csistent and nonexistent (the former sccn under its own aspect and the latter under alien oncs) The three corresponding formulac arc • sjád asty eva, syān nasty cva, sjad asli rast ca The two statements of
1 The AUTHOR failed to recognise this in "Wortc," p 25, ann
2 Philos p51. The reference to the Suy agadaniy made by Satis Chandra VIDYABHUSANA (Logic p 8) is misleading