________________
the Kárman:
ties.
This theory also labours under serious Ouddrika is 2:6,
į difficulties. The first question which we put the cause of its difficul: to such theorists is, how does it produce the
outer nature of man? Mere being or the fact of existence of the inner nature cannot account for the origin of the outer nature. The mere being of a thing cannot explain the origin of another thing, so we are led to assert that the Kårman-sarira transforms itself into the Ouddrika sarira. Here the same difficulties re-appear! How to explain the fact of (1) Co-existence and (2) Inter-action.
Others may think that the right theory is this : Kårman-sarira does not produce the Oudúrika sarira, but on the contrary Ouddrika produces the Karman-sarira.
Oud&rika is the cause of the kârmansarira : but this theory is open to another fresh objection in addition to the previous difficulties. Theactivity of the Oudârika-sarira is possible only when it is actuated by desires and will. Has any body heard of unmotived activities ? And these desires and will belong to the K’arman-sarira : so the obvious mistake is here to make the presupposition of a thing, the product of it. That without which the
332
