Disclaimer: This translation does not guarantee complete accuracy, please confirm with the original page text.
11
Paternal and Guru-kula. They were and lived a religious life; they were not even allowed to stay in their native state for a long time. * And this was a practice that religious institutions in India, especially in Buddhist India, presented to younger sons. By falling into this practice, capable Acharyas sometimes gained more fame than their royal brothers. It is possible that Samantabhadra also had to go through such a situation; his elder brother may have been the ruler, he may have received the throne on the death of his father, and therefore Samantabhadra may not have ruled or married; but understanding his situation, he may have molded his life into a religious mold from the beginning; and on the death of his father or before that, he may have been initiated; and perhaps this is the reason why his going to Uragapura again and staying there is rarely found. But whatever it may be, there is no doubt that there was not even a hint of artificiality in your religious culmination. You are naturally
* This custom is known from the writings of an ancient Chinese writer (Matwan-lin, cited in Ind. Ant. IX, 22. See, Vincent Smith's Early History of India 'p. 185, a part of which is as follows -
An ancient Chinese writer assures us that 'according to the laws of India, when a king dies, he is succeeded by his eldest son (Kumărarăjă ); the other sons leave the family and enter a religious life, and they are no longer allowed to reside in their native kingdom.'
For Personal & Private Use Only