Disclaimer: This translation does not guarantee complete accuracy, please confirm with the original page text.
Future Tirthankarahood.
In this very text, a verse is found as follows:
"He who bears the burden of patience, does not speak clearly about the Lord.
Your words, from devotion, are like the touch of a touchstone, full of essence." (6)
Here, in a few words, the great merit of Arhat devotion is shown - it is explained that "O Lord, just as iron, by consuming (touching) the touchstone (parasa-pashana), becomes gold and gains brilliance, in the same way, this human being, by serving you, becomes a very clear (detailed) knower, bearing brilliance, and his speech also becomes essential and profound."
It seems that Samantabhadra, due to his devotion of this kind, always remained absorbed in Arhat devotion, and this was the result of his devotion, that he became so knowledgeable and brilliant, and his words were unique and possessed unparalleled greatness. - Samantabhadra's path of devotion becomes very clear from a deep study of his praise-texts. In fact, Samantabhadra was an embodiment of all three - Jnana Yoga, Karma Yoga, and Bhakti Yoga - he was not a partisan of any one of these Yogas alone - he did not have any one-sidedness.
"The praise of the fire of the forest of birth, the memory, even though it is overwhelmed by the ocean of afflictions, is the ultimate treasure for the devotees, a replica, the ultimate fulfillment of all desires. Those who are honored, even though they are not elevated, are not diminished, but are always joyful.
May the Lord of the Gods, the givers, the victors, be merciful to them." (115)
One-sidedness, which is taken for the impartial behavior of the doctrines, is called "niri" or "mithya" one-sidedness. Samantabhadra was free from this mithya-ekantata; in refuting an objection in the Devagama, he wrote, "There is no mithya-ekantata in us."