________________
hiii)
que,
.
63 Bauddha viow refuted more on 64 Vedłnta view refuted in
. ya ya and Vaisesika views criticised and the Sārnkhya
view ostablished; the first argument in favour thoroof. 66 The second argument in favour of the effect being an entity... 67 The third argument 68 The fourth argument -69 The fifth argument ...
*** 70 Proofs of the non-difference of cause of effect ... 71 The offect only a particular development of the cause 72 Objection based on the nature of the manifestation of the
effect ... 73 Objection set aside as being common to both thoories 94 Production of the cloth not identical with the cloth ... 75 Nocossity of Sausal operation 76 Conclusion of the Karikā
.
.
Kärikā X 77 lątroduction to the consideration of the Manifest 78 The Manifested as having a cause ...
being non-eternal ...
.. non pervading ... .. active
multi-form
component .. soluble .. conjunct
.. dependent .87 The contrary nature of the Unmanifest
Kūrikā XI 88 latroduction to Kārikā Xl ... .89 Similaritios bot woon the Manifest and the Unmanifest! ...(i) with the three attributes 90 (ii) undistinguishable ...
# Qbjection based on the Bauddha idealism 92 fi) losostioni ... . 33 .fiv) Productive ... ... ... ... 4 Similarity with Nature stated ...
Dissimilarity.of these bronn Spirit ... * Otajoction based on similarity of the Spirit with the Manitost...
1
