Nyaya Pravesha Part 1

SR No.: 008423
Original Sutra Author: N/A
Author: Anandshankar B Dhruva
Publisher: Oriental Research Institute Vadodra
Publication Year: 1968
Total Pages: 228
Language: Sanskrit, English
Classification: Book_Devnagari & Philosophy
File Size: 5 MB

Page 156

32
It is not the 21 in itself that proves, but CERTAs an observed particular of a general proposition that proves. Hence the ó ezrat,' like the 'GIELT' of the Brāhmaṇa Nyaya, includes Th. This is supposed to be an original contribution of Buddhists to Indian Logic which later Brahmanas adopted in their own system. Compare, however, "3E9FuArticia=mit.
#afari zíhla," also "ta: 27Hvítalatej fala--
Vätayāyana's N. Bhāşya I. i. 34-35. TT. 9. 9. na gaur aquao ---This should be read with the preceding “3661: P. 19 1. 5. gengur: ”. Of the three 997, la and U17 the 484 is the central
obiect towards which the fa and the 17 are directed. पूर्वाचार्याणां &c.-This ‘संज्ञान्तर' of 'पूर्वाचार्यs' goes as far back as
the terminology of the Nyāyasūtra of Gotama.
I. Gasina:......9974-Explanation of 29715HZQ7 BMazahiP. 50ab. Salozitía: Let us note that while yra is the objective fact cf
the pervasion of one real by another real, sa ma is the subjective process of tracing a universal truth through a number of particulars. 74-34945 HEATH: e. the three collectively,
and none singly, can prove the proposition. FOT. J. 412279:--"Ch. appears to read' arq- (or arga-) ETHIE' while T P. 2. 1. 13. reads S91477” (N. Pr. Part II p. 14. Comparative Notes ),
Explain : साध्यरूपो यः पक्षः तस्याभासः Note that here पक्ष is already shown to be not only the minor term (H) but the proposition in which the major term is predicated of the minor (vifarra ). If you read Fateha:, explain it thus: 472759: ANAF 4: 44: तस्याभासः Note that 'साधन' is not only the हेतु or हेतुवचन but qilgaarifa ATH'. 'F7E71914:' of T' is as shown above not a good reading. Of course, पक्ष is साध्य and consequently पक्षाभास is साध्याभास: But this creates confusion, unless the word as is restricted to 981 and is throughout used as a synonym of 94. The fallacies of 49 are also known as fallacies of afaat(See
Bhamba's Káyy&l. ) न्या. प्र. साधयितुमिष्टोऽपि-Recall 'साध्यत्वेनेप्सितः' in the defintion of पक्ष (N. Pr. P. 2, 1. 13 p. 17.). The Panjikā notes in this connection: Arafatalke ran to P, 3, 1. 7. Anara rite mina (Pañj. P 50 b ).