________________
: 192:
Jinabhadra Gani's
[The sixth
D. C. Even in the statement-viz Jive ya ye pose, ya se sapaese no-jive" of Anuyogadvāra Sūtra, the samabhiradha naya does not admit a part separated from jiva as no-jiva but only that which is intimately connected with jiva. This naya interpretes the statement thus:-A part of the animate region is no-jiva. Jiva-pradeśa is here explained as a karmadhāraya compound and not as a Tat-puruṣa one. Jiva therefore becomes the adjective of pradleśa, meaning thereby “ Animate region.” Thus, according to the samabhiradha naya, a part of the animate region is no-jiva, and it does not take anything different from the animate region as no-jiva as you take.
How would the third category be found in such il case ? For, although, considering the existence of no--jîva, there is no difference between jiva and no-jîva according to the Samabhirūdha naya. No-jîva is nothing but a part of jîva and hence there are only two categories viz jîva and a-jiva. (which naturally includes no-jî va.) Other nayas, also, do not admit anything like no-jiva as different from jiva anit a-jiva. The category of no-jîva therefore, seems to be an original conception of none but yourself. 181-183 (2476-2478)
Even further than that, the Ācārya argues :इच्छउ व समभिरूढो देसं नोजीवमेगनइयं तु । मिच्छत्तं सम्मत्तं सव्वनयमयोवरोहेणं ॥१८४॥२४७९॥ तं जइ सम्वनयमयं जिणमयमिच्छसि पवन दो रासी। पयविप्पडिवत्तीए वि मिच्छत्तं किं नु रासीसु ? ॥१८५।।२४८०॥ 184. Icchau va samabhiradho desam no-jivameganaiyam tu !
Micchattam sammattam savvanayamayovarohenam. (2479) 185. Tam jai savvanayamayam Jiņamayamicchasi pavajja do
rāsi
Payavippaļivattie vi micchattam kim nu rāsisu? (2480) (39 a haftast ei alustainaperti di मिथ्यात्वं सम्यक्त्वं सर्वनयमतोपरोधेन ॥१८४॥२४७९॥
Jain Education International
For Private & Personal Use Only
www.jainelibrary.org
