________________
: 146: Jinabhattra Gari's
[The fifth मात्रमेव ज्ञाने उपयोगयोग्यतामात्रव्यवस्थापनमेव, एकस्मिस्तु वस्तुन्येककाल - पयोगानेकता कापि नास्ति, क्रमेणैवोपयोगानां भावादिति ॥१४॥२४३८॥ D. C.
Ārya Ganga -While describing the process of avagraha (general apprehension ) etc, apprehension of plenty of paryāyas, has already been laid down by the Holy Writ. Then, what harm is there if we accept innumerable or endless applications (of mind) at the same time ?
Acarya:--That is not proper. For, in that rule, general apprehension of innumerable paryāyas of an object (with regard to the perception of an object ) is meant; but plurality of the application of mind in one object at one time is not at all meant. Applications of mind are always made one after the other. 143 (2438) समयमणेगरगहणं जइ सीओसिणदुगम्मि को दोसो ?। केण व भणियं दोसो उवओगदुगे वियारोष्यं ॥१४४॥२४३९॥ 144. Samayamaņegaggahaņam jai siösiņadugammi ko doso ? |
Keņa va bhaniyam doso uvaögaduge viyaro'yam. (2439) [समकमनेकग्रहणं यदि शीतोष्णद्विके को दोषः । केन वा भणितं दोष उपयोगद्विके विचारोऽयम् ॥१४४॥२४३९॥ 144. Samakamanekagrahaņam yadi śītoşņadvike ko doşaḥ? 1
Kena va bhanitam doşa upayogadvike vicāro'yam (2439) ]
Trans. 144. “ If the simultaneous apprehension of many paryayas (is acceptible), what harm is there (in accepting) sensations of heat and cold (being felt ) simultaneously." Who says that there is any harm (in accepting so )? Here the question is of two upayogas or applications ( being simultaneous" 2439.
टीका-१४४ यद्याचार्य ! समकं युगपदनेकेषामर्थानां ग्रहणं त्वयाप्यनुज्ञायते तदा शीतोष्णद्वये गृह्यमाणे को दोषः येन गङ्गाभ्युपगमो प्यते ? । सूरिराह
Jain Education International
For Private & Personal Use Only
www.jainelibrary.org