________________
the court's order".
If the Government proposes a resolution that there won't be a court in the entire country, there won't be any jail, jailer, or punishment and that people are free to behave in any manner they please and was to seek our opinion of that decision, would we agree or disagree with such a proposal?
"Definitely disagree”.
Why? This is because we know that in such a situation there will not be any law and order. There will be total anarchy and chaos. We will not be able to live our lives peacefully. The existence of law and order indicates that the court is active and if at all there is any degree of disorder, it is due to the courts being inactive and lax to that extent. There is law and order in all the countries in the world and even in the Universe. This means that there definitely has to be a court which is active. This court is what we know as 'Karmasatta' or karma dispensing authority. The Indian Government considers only human beings as its citizens. Nature, which has set up this court of 'karmasatta', considers all souls - may they be humans, animals, birds, crawling creatures, the tiniest insects, one sensed souls like vegetation and in effect all life, as its citizens.
The task of the court is only to authorise punishment, for example, the judge himself does not whip the prisoner. That job is assigned to the jailer. In the same manner, the court of karmasatta only decides the punishment but who
Karmasatta - Karma dispensing authority.
6
