________________
VII, 5, 6.
DISSENSIONS IN THE ORDER.
271
through the whole Eighteen Points] without directing his opinion and his approval and his pleasure and his intention thereto, and in the belief that the doctrine he propounds is in accordance with the Dhamma, and that the schism resulting therefrom would be so too?'
Here ends the Third Portion for Recitation.
Here ends the Seventh Khandhaka, on Divisions
in the Samgha.
1 The sum of the last two sections seems to come to this, that practically such a schism as would have the awful effects set out above in § 4 would be impossible in Buddhism. For not only is a formal putting forward and voting on the false doctrine essential to schism as distinct from mere disagreement, but the offending Bhikkhu must also be quite aware that the doctrine so put forth is wrong, or at least doubtful, and also that the schism resulting from his action will be, or will probably be, disastrous to the Dhamma. In other words, the schism must be brought about by deliberately putting forward a doctrine known to be false, or at least doubtful,
ntention or hope of thereby injuring the cause of the Dhamma (that is, of the Truth).
Digitized by
Digitized by Google
