________________
432
KULLAVAGGA.
III, 34, I.
1
bath
34. 1. “Two Bhikkhus have been guilty of a Samghadisesa offence, and as touching that Samghâdisesa offence they are of opinion that it is a Samghâdisesa offence! One of them conceals, the other does not conceal it. He who has concealed it should be compelled to confess himself guilty of a dukkatą. offence, and a probation corresponding to the period during which he has concealed it having been imposed upon him, a Mânatta should be imposed upon them both.
*Two Bhikkhus have been guilty of a Samghadisesa offence, and as touching that Samghâdisesa offence they are in doubt. One of them conceals, the other does not conceal it. [The penalty is the same.]2
Two Bhikkhus have been guilty of a Samghâdisesa offence, and as touching that Samghâdisesa offence they are of opinion that it is a mixed offence 3. One of them conceals, the other does not conceal it. [The penalty is the same.] 2
'Two Bhikkhus have been guilty of a mixed offence, and as touching that mixed offence they are of opinion that it is a Samghâdisesa offence. One of
* Compare chap. 23, § 4. ? The concluding words of the last paragraph are here repeated.
* The Samanta Pâsâdikâ says, Missakan ti thullakkayâdihi missitam; that is an act which involves not only a Samghadisesa, but also some one or other of the lesser offences. Compare the use of missaka at Gâtaka II, 420, 433, and at Maha-parinibbana Sutta, ed. Childers, p. 22.
Digitized by
Digilzed by Google
