________________
1, 34, 1. THE MINOR DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS.
381
to be warned [&c., as in chapter 25, down to the end of the Kammavâkâ, including the supplementary sentence as to the proclamation].”
33.
[Here follow the twelve cases in which the Kamma is against the law, the twelve cases in which it is according to law, the six permissive cases in which it can be carried out if the Samgha likes, and the eighteen divisions of the right conduct for the convicted Bhikkhu to pursue, precisely as in chapters 2, 3, 4, and 5, reading Ukkhepaniya-kamma for not renouncing a sinful doctrine,' instead of 'Tagganiya-kamma.']
34.
1. So the Samgha carried out against Arittha the Bhikkhu, who had formerly been a vulture tormentor, the Ukkhepaniya-kamma for not renouncing a sinful doctrine, to the intent that he should not eat nor dwell with the Samgha. And when he had been thus subjected by the Samgha to the Ukkhepaniya-kamma for not renouncing a sinful doctrine, he left the Order.
Those Bhikkhus who were moderate were annoyed, murmured, and became indignant, saying, “How can Arittha the Bhikkhu, having been subjected by the Samgha to the Ukkhepaniya-kamma for not
Digitized by
Digilzed by Google
