________________
IV ADHYAYA, 2 PÂDA, 2.
365
express absorption of the thing (i.e. the organ of speech) itself, there would be 'non-division' in all cases, and for what reason then should non-division' be specially stated in another case (i.e. in the case of which Sūtra 16 treats)? The meaning therefore is that the different functions are retracted, and that while the function of the mind continues to go on the function of speech is retracted first.—Why 80 ?— Because this is seen. It is a matter of observation that while the mind continues to act the function of speech comes to an end; nobody, on the other hand, is able to see that the organ of speech itself, together with its function, is merged in the mind.- But are we not justified in assuming such a merging of speech in the mind, on the ground of scriptural statement ?—This is impossible, we reply, since mind is not the causal substance of speech. We are entitled to assume only that a thing is merged in what is its causal substance; a pot e.g. (when destroyed) is merged in clay. But there is no proof whatever for speech originating from mind. On the other hand we observe that functions originate and are retracted even where they do not inhere in causal substances. The function of fire, e.g. which is of the nature of heat, springs from fuel which is of the nature of earth, and it is extinguished in water.But how do you, on this interpretation, account for the scriptural statement that
speech is merged in the mind?'-'And on account of the scriptural statement,' the Satrakåra replies. The scriptural statement also may be reconciled with our interpretation, in so far as the function and the thing to which the function belongs are viewed as non-different.
2. And for the same reason all (sense-organs) (follow) after (mind).
• Therefore he whose light has gone out comes to a new birth with his senses merged in the mind' (Pr. Up. III, 9); this passage states that all senses without difference are merged in the mind. 'For the same reason,' i.e. because there also as in the case of speech, it is observed that the eye and so on discontinue their functions, while the mind together with its functions persists, and because the organs
Digitized by
Digized by Google