Saddharma Pundarika

SR No.: 007677
Original Sutra Author: N/A
Author: H Kern
Publisher: Oxford
Publication Year: 1884
Total Pages: 2546
Language: English
Classification: Book_English
File Size: 46 MB

Page 2211

VIII, 189.
CIVIL AND CRIMINAL LAW; DEPOSITS.
287
(of that description) in his hands, for which others accuse him.
184. But if he restores not that gold, as he ought, to those (spies), then he shall be compelled by force to restore both (deposits); that is a settled rule of law.
185. An open or a sealed deposit must never be returned to a near relative (of the depositor during the latter's lifetime); for if the recipient) dies (without delivering them), they are lost, but if he does not die, they are not lost.
186. But (a depositary) who of his own accord returns them to a near relative of a deceased (depositor), must not be harassed (about them) by the king or by the depositor's relatives.
187. And (in doubtful cases) he should try to obtain that object by friendly means, without (having recourse to) artifice, or having inquired into the (depositary's) conduct, he should settle (the matter) with gentle means.
188. Such is the rule for obtaining back all those open deposits; in the case of a sealed deposit (the depositary) shall incur no (censure), unless he has taken out something.
189. (A deposit) which has been stolen by thieves
185. Pratyanantare,'to a near relative,' i. e. 'to his son, brother, or wife' (Medh.).
187. According to Nâr., this verse refers to cases when one believes a deposit to be with another, but has not made it over oneself; according to Gov, and Kull., to cases where there may be an error. Gov, and Kull. think that the person who should act in the manner described is the king, and they explain anvikkhet, 'one should try to obtain,' by he should decide.' Nár. and Ragh., on the other hand, think that the depositor should act thus. The former explanation is perhaps preferable. . 189. Yagñ. II, 66.
Digitized by
Digitized by Google