________________
336
KULLAVAGGA.
I, 4, 2.
association with the world. · There are three things, O Bhikkhus, which, when the Samgha suspects (&c., as before, down to) against him.
There are other three things, O Bhikkhus, (&c., as before, down to) against him; (that is to say), when he has failed in morality as regards moral things—when he has failed in conduct as regards transgression—when he has failed in opinion as regards the principal matters of opinion? There are three things, O Bhikkhus, (&c., as before, down to) against him.
“There are other three things, O Bhikkhus, (&c., as before, down to) against him; (that is to say), when he speaks in dispraise of the Buddha-when he speaks in dispraise of the Dhamma—when he speaks in dispraise of the Samgha. These are three things, O Bhikkhus, (&c., as before, down to) against him.
2. “There are three kinds of Bhikkhus, O Bhikkhus, against whom, if the Samgha likes, it should carry out the Tagganiya-kamma; (that is to say), one who is a maker of strife (&c., as in § 1, down to) a raiser of legal questions in the Samgha-one who is dull, stupid, full of faults, and devoid of merit-and one who is living in lay society, in unlawful association with the world. These are three kinds of Bhikkhus, O Bhikkhus, (&c., as before, down to the Tagganiya-kamma.
There are other three kinds of Bhikkhus, O Bhikkhus, against whom, if the Samgha likes, it should carry out the Tagganiya-kamma; (that is to say), one who has failed in morality in regard to moral matters--one who has failed in conduct
Compare Mahâvagga I, 36, 8, and our note there.
Digitized by
Digitized by Google