________________
270
KULLAVAGGA.
VII, 5, 6.
(c) ... in belief that the doctrine is against the Dhamma, but in uncertainty whether the schism resulting therefrom would be against the Dhamma or not ...
(d) ... in belief that the doctrine is in accordance with the Dhamma, but that the schism resulting therefrom would be against the Dhamma ...
(e) ... in belief that the doctrine is in accordance with the Dhamma, but in uncertainty whether the schism resulting therefrom would be against the Dhamma or not ...
... in uncertainty whether the doctrine is against the Dhamma or not, but in the belief that the schism resulting therefrom would be against the Dhamma ...
(8)... in uncertainty whether the doctrine is against the Dhamma or not, and in the belief that the schism resulting therefrom would be against the Dhamma ...
(h) ... in uncertainty whether the doctrine would be against the Dhamma, and in uncertainty whether the schism resulting therefrom would be against the Dhamma or not ...]
[The whole paragraph is then again repeated, reading successively for 'gives out that which is not Dhamma as Dhamma' each of the Eighteen Points given in full in VII, 5, 2.]
6. Who then, Lord, is one who breaks up the Samgha, and yet is not doomed to be reborn in states either of suffering or of woe; is not doomed to remain in such states for a Kalpa; and is not so doomed that his position is irretrievable ?'
'In case, Upâli, a Bhikkhu gives out what is not Dhamma as Dhamma [and so on successively
Digitized by
Digitized by Google