________________
58
KULLAVAGGA.
IV, 14, 27.
Proceeding for those who are obstinate—may be settled by the two other modes of settlement—to wit, the Proceeding in Presence, and the Proceeding for those who are consciously innocent ?” he should be told, “ Yes, it can." (If he should say), “How may that be?" the answer should be as follows:
'In case the Bhikkhus bring a groundless charge against a Bhikkhu of a breach of morality. In respect thereof, O Bhikkhus, to that Bhikkhu whose memory in regard to the matter is quite clear, the Proceeding for the consciously innocent is to be accorded.
And thus, O Bhikkhus, is to be granted (&c., as in chapter 4, § 10, down to the end, with the necessary alterations for a general rule instead of a particular case).
*This, O Bhikkhus, is called a legal question that has been settled. And how settled ? By the Proceeding in Presence, and by the Proceeding for the consciously innocent. And what therein belongs to the Proceeding in Presence? The presence of the Samgha, and the presence of the Dhamma, and the presence of the Vinaya, and the presence of the particular person. And therein what is the presence of the Samgha (&c., as in § 16, down to the end)? And what therein belongs to the Proceeding for the consciously innocent ? The carrying out of, the accomplishment of, the proceeding by, the undertaking of, the acceptance of, the pacification of the Proceeding for the consciously innocent'. That is what belongs herein to the Proceeding for the consciously innocent.'
This clause corresponds to the one above, in $ 24, and below, in § 29.
Digitized by
Digized by Google