Studies In Sanskrit Sahitya Shastra

SR No.: 007023
Original Sutra Author: N/A
Author: V M Kulkarni
Publisher: B L Institute of Indology
Publication Year: 1983
Total Pages: 216
Language: English
Classification: Book_English
File Size: 22 MB

Page 179

Sanskrit Sahityaŝästra
[आनीत पुलको भेदः सपत्नी प्रणय-परिधूसरेऽपि गुरुके । प्रिय दर्शने प्रवर्धते मन्यु-स्थानेऽपि रुक्मिण्याः प्रहर्षः ।।]
This verse is further on (Vol. IV. p. 1220) cited by Bhoja to illustrate. 'SandarSanath' (=priyavalokanam). It is also cited in SK (p. 673 v. 330) to illustrate "janmāntara-satiskārajanitah sahajo (rāgah). As the verse is in the skandhaka metre and as it speaks of Rukmini and her sapatni (Satyabhama) and priya (Hari), we may reasonably conclude that it is drawn from HV.
9 ) [Pratināyikāsu] uddhatā yathā—
Kuvia a saccabhāmā..... (Vol. III, p 773) This verse has been already presented. Vide No. 4 supra. 10) [Atha prakāśānurāgah ...] jyestha-vişayo yathā— Tam tiasa-kusuma-dāmaṁ..... (Vol. III, p. 812) This verse has been already dealt with. Vide No. 6 supra. M) [Atha prakasānuragah) kanisthāvisayo yatha
Kuviā a saccahāmā.... ( Vol. III, p. 812 ) This verse has been already dealt with. Vide No. 4 supra. 12) Tasya (dhira-madhyäyä) eva sambhoge
(anubhava-sampad ) yatha
To se rubbhanta ccia..... (Vol. III, p. 840)
167
तो से रुष्यंत चिअ हिअअ-विअंभंत दरिस - बेडच्छलिआ । पाअपडिअस्त हरिणो पडिआ पुडी वाह- सलिल- त्थेषा ॥ [ततस्तस्या रुध्यमाना एव हृदय-विजृम्भमाण- हर्षवेगोच्छलिताः । पाद - पतितस्य हरेः पतिताः पृष्ठे वाष्प-सलिल-बिन्दवः ||]
This verse is cited further on (p. 1C41 ) to illustrate 'Punarbhāva', one of the Manopalantis and still further on (1209) Priyotthapana'. The verse describes the various anubhavas of Satyabhāmā when Hari fell prostrate at her feet with a view to appeasing her anger.
13) Mimite paricchinatti pramānamasäviti manah | yatha
Kuviā a saccabhāmā.... ( Vol. III, p. 860)
This verse has been already dealt with. Vide No. 4 supra. 14) Priyādisu vyāja- nindotprāso yathā—
Sa kusumehi guruià.... (Vol. IV, p. 990)
This verse, especially its second half, is quite corrupt. It is further on (p. 1212) cited by Bhoja to illustrate 'upalambhaḥ'. There too it is found to be corrupt and it shows a few gaps in its first half. The verse may tentatively be corrected as follows:
सा कुसुमेहि गुरुहआ मह वि कओ सुहअ दंसणेण पसाओ ।
कह अ ण पसाअ - सहो लग्गउ पिआ - हिअअस्स अ इमस्स तुज्झ ॥ [सा कुसुमैर्गुरुकृता ममापि कृतस्सुभग दर्शनेन प्रसादः ।
कथश्च न प्रसाद - शब्दो लगतु प्रिया - हृदयस्य चास्य तब ॥ ]