________________
The Text of the Tatvārthādhigama-sūtrāņi
333
fully distinct. It can also be gathered from the remarks of Siddhasena in his Bhāsyānusārini where he very often complains of previous writers who appear to have confused the text of the Sūtra and the Bhāsya with each other.
Annotations : 1. It is to be noted that of the Sūtra works of the heterodox systems of philosophy
we know only two, the Brhaspati Sūtras of the Cārvākas and the present work
belonging to Jainism and have only the later one. 2. T.S. II, 13 and the corresponding Sūtra of the Digambara recension. 3. T. S. I, 34. 4. No. 31.
5. No 22. 6. Kundakunda and others add Tapas in such a context. 7. T. S. I, 1. Utta. XXVII, 2. 8. Utta. XXVII, 16-27. T. S. I, 2 foll.
9. Utta. XXVII, 14, T: S. I, 3. 10. Cp. Pt. Sukhalalji in Anekānta. 11. Sambandha-Kārikā 31; V. 37. 12. cf. T. S. I, 25, 26, 27, 31 and so on; II, 25 etc. 13. I am indebted to Prof. Upadhye for this information. 14. Cf. Bhāsya on IV, 1. 15. Kävyamālā No. 25 p. 138. 16. Pujyapāda Akalanka and others do not give these verses. 17. Ed. by Nitave at Kolhapur. 18. Cp. Jambudvipaprajñapti, Suryaprajñapati Candraprajñapti and other works. 19. T. S. IV, 1. 20. Cf. 28 Bhedasamghātābhyām Cāksusah, and 32, Snigdharuksatvät bandhah. 21. Ed. by Kapadia Vol. I, p. 261, 320, Vol. II. p. 101 etc.
28 The Text of the Tatvārthādhigama-sūtrāņi
The Journal of the University of Bombay 1935
