________________
શ્રી અંતરિક્ષ પાર્શ્વનાથ તીર્થ their Lordships. carry with it any admission of a right on the part of the Digambaris to participate in the management. No one has, in fact, suggested that the time-table without management is valueless, on the contrary, the evidence shows that this has been the prevailing order since the final rupture between the parties took place in 1908.
Their lordships need hardly affirm that they may call the Digambari right to the time-table as now declared, with all its implications, is in no sense a matter of favor. It is a matter of right by the Digambaris will bring them into conflict with the courts. Nor will they forget that, by the admission of their learned counsel before the Board, they make no claim to the collections of money and offerings made by worshipers during the Digambari periods of worship. With these matters kept fully in mind by the Swetambaris there seems to their Lordships to be no reason why under this arrangement the relations between the two sects should not in this matter be in the future entirely harmonious.
In the result, therefore, the appeal fails and their Lordships will humbly advise His Majesty that it be dismiseed with costs.
Their Lordships will further humbly advise His Majesty that a petition lodged by the appellants for a stay of execution of the decree of the Judicial Commissioner be also dismissed with costs.
DECREE
"The court of the judicial Commissioners on the 1st October 1923 made a decree setting aside the decree of Lower Court and ordering (1) That the Swetambaris are entitled to the exclusive management of the temple and image of Shri
૫૯
