________________
Scribe
nistook
va
for
,
va
,
Śs for viti dhya vya piti Ipa , lya stă stya stva . ..stu dha va va
pa, ca
| Scribe mistook ra
kşya ba kta bya dha ya ma
pra nta
::::::::::::::::
Pa
ca
ta
vu KT
nya
svi
nila
nua na „ ta
nna na, va ba pa cca via
bhu sta
sta nya
sa 'ma hņa hna sva sta
va ca, tra, ba bha da
da ). va ya ma
dva , ddha ccha ttha
yvi. tri tr
dra dbha tra
nu kşa tka .. pa ya
bas dropped : Now let us note some specimens of the misreadings found in the ins, which are due to this type of mistakes on the part of the scribe.
li) p. 6, l. 13: Here we have righnu päragamādi. The ms. contains righnalārugamidi. The scribe has mistaken for 7, and he seems to have put at for a thinking that it would give a correct reading.
(ii) p. 7, 1. 1 : There occurs 'Hann hnaval paryāyao!. In the ms. we have tatra nima talparyayu'. This corrupt reading of the ms. is due to the fact that the scribe mistook it for a, .for 7, and a for a.
(iii) p. 19, 1. 30 : Here we have haddhastyandhao. The ms. contains Shidousländha'. This reading of the ms. is difficult to understand and does not fit well in the context. I think the scribe bas mistaken ddhu and styu for dra and slå respectively.
Jain Education International
For Private & Personal Use Only
www.jainelibrary.org
