________________ 194 STUDIES IN JAIN LITERATURE (pp. 173-176) (pp. 179-198) KM.(pp. 42-44), NS XVIII. 98-99 KM. XVII & XVIII (pp. 89-112) -Pada-dosas (pp. 199-201) SK I. 93 W 126-127 KP. VII V. 202 -Vakyadosas (pp. 201-226) -Ubhayadosas (pp. 226-261) Vamana II, ii, SK I, W. II. KP. VII and X. Vamana II, i. Dhv. (II) & Locana W. II; KP. VII Artha-dosas (pp. 261-273) Vamana. II ii; SK I W.II; KP, VII Dr. Raghavan's remarks on Hemacandra's treatment of Dosas are very apposite : ".... Chapter III of Hemacandra's Kavyanusasana is almost identical with chapter VII of Mammata's Kavyaprakasa. The number, nature and the illustrations of all the flaws are the same in the two books. In Hemacandra's own commentary on his work, Hemacandra has given additional matter drawn from Anandavardhana and Mahimabhatta under the heads of Rasadosas, Avimosta-vidheya and Prakrama and Krama Bhangas." (Sr. Pra. p. 246) Gunavivecana ch.IV(pp. 274 Mainly based on Ns. 294) XVII, KD; Vamana; and KP. (VIII) Dr. Raghavan's observations on Hemacandra's treatment of Gunas are very pertinent : "On Gunas Hemacandra is a follower of Anandavardhana and he draws upon Mammata and probably from Rajasekhara also... As regards the three Gunas, Hemacandra considers that Madhurya is of the highest degree in Vipralambha, a little less in Karuna and still less in santa. शान्तकरुणविप्रलम्भेषु सातिशयम् / "This is one of the views recorded later by Jagannatha..." Hemacandra's treatment of Gunas is noteworthy for his "reference to strange views on Gunas". One view holds that Ojas, Prasada, Madhurya, Samya and Audarya are the five Gunas (in the sense of Patha-dharmas). The other view is these five Gunas belong to certain metres. Hemacandra criticises both : Jain Education International For Private & Personal Use Only www.jainelibrary.org
