Jaina Theory of Multiple Facets of Reality and Truth

SR No.: 001746
Original Sutra Author: N/A
Author: Nagin J Shah
Publisher: B L Institute of Indology
Publication Year: 2000
Total Pages: 168
Language: English
Classification: Book_English, Philosophy, & Nyay
File Size: 12 MB

Page 131

A Few Modern Interpretations of Non-absolutism
2. The difference of philosophers is, however, a matter of conviction deeper than reason can probe.' (op. cit. p.20) 3. "...my philosophical convictions are rather enlisted on the side. of Sankara's Vedanta'. (op. cit. pp.19-20)
These conclusions raise one major question to which, according to my judgement, the scholars should seriously pay attention: Is the difference of philosophers really a matter of conviction deeper than reason can probe? If it is so, ultimately all reasoning in the field of philosophy is an exercise in futility. Things have to be decided by 'conviction deeper than reason can probe'. Why, then, reasoning at all? In answer it may be said that though reasoning is not the final authority, yet it is helpful as it paves the way for coming to a conviction or it fortifies our convictions, which are themselves beyond reasoning. Thus logic is to be relegated to the secondary position in such a situation.
113
In case, however, we accept that logic can lead us to truth, the Jainas have to adduce some more arguments in favour of non-absolutism as against the absolutistic attitude of Vedanta. Almost all such arguments have been forcefully put forth by Dr. Mookerjee and yet, his 'convictions are rather enlisted on the side of Sankara's Vedanta'. Can the Jainas put forth some more convincing arguments so that people like Dr. Mookerjee are forced to rethink? Or is it to be taken merely as a matter of personal liking?
II
On the historical plane, the question of the origination of the theory of non-absolutism is quite interesting. Dr. Nathmal Tatia in his D. Litt dissertation Studies in Jaina Philosophy has given some hints regarding this point which are developed by Dr. B.K. Matilal in his work, The Central Philosophy of Jainism. The difficulty lies in the fact that Acārānga, the earliest work on Jainism, does not mention nonabsolutism. The statement that 'one who knows one, knows all' hardly indicates non-absolutism, because the context where the sentence occurs, has no relation with non-absolutism but with conquest of the passions, meaning that in order to understand one passion, one has